Boycott Scotch

[Doctorossi]

Originally Posted by TheTraveler

National security, yes.

Well, think about the idea that that expenditure basically is national security. While giving Khadaffi a tax-break feels lame, it's absolutely pocket-lint on chump-change next to what we'd be spending if we pissed him off and had to send the army after him.

Ounce of prevention, you know?

[Genetic Defect]

Originally Posted by Doctorossi

Well, think about the idea that that expenditure basically is national security. While giving Khadaffi a tax-break feels lame, it's absolutely pocket-lint on chump-change next to what we'd be spending if we pissed him off and had to send the army after him.

Ounce of prevention, you know?

you are right, it would be cheaper to hit him in that tax free home

----------------
Now playing: Black Label Society - Give Yourself to Me
via FoxyTunes

Originally Posted by Doctorossi

Well, think about the idea that that expenditure basically is national security. While giving Khadaffi a tax-break feels lame, it's absolutely pocket-lint on chump-change next to what we'd be spending if we pissed him off and had to send the army after him.

Ounce of prevention, you know?

If we pissed him off???

For some reason I'm not worried about that.

[Doctorossi]

Originally Posted by BC-Axeman

If we pissed him off???

For some reason I'm not worried about that.

Touche!

[bobarian]

Boycott Scotch!


Boycott Libya!

No camel on the bbq this week!