Official SEC Football Thread 2011

SvilleKid · 12-04-2011, 07:31 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Powers

I'm excited

I guess the only way to have an SEC team lose in the national title game is to have two of 'em play each other

And now, the Big 10 doesn't have to worry about looking like weaklings in another national championship game against the SEC!!

I have to disagree strongly with what the OkSt coach said about what the fans want to see. He said something to the tune that the fans want to see a 36-35 National championship game, not a 6-3 game. If Oklahoma State played LSU in the game, it would be a 45-3 game (LSU winning), not a 36-35 game!!! What was he thinking about!!

longknocker · 12-04-2011, 07:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SvilleKid

And now, the Big 10 doesn't have to worry about looking like weaklings in another national championship game against the SEC!!

I have to disagree strongly with what the OkSt coach said about what the fans want to see. He said something to the tune that the fans want to see a 36-35 National championship game, not a 6-3 game. What was he thinking??? If Oklahoma State played LSU in the game, it would be a 45-3 game (LSU winning), not a 36-35 game!!! What was he thinking about!!

True!

E.J. · 12-04-2011, 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SvilleKid

And now, the Big 10 doesn't have to worry about looking like weaklings in another national championship game against the SEC!!

I have to disagree strongly with what the OkSt coach said about what the fans want to see. He said something to the tune that the fans want to see a 36-35 National championship game, not a 6-3 game. If Oklahoma State played LSU in the game, it would be a 45-3 game (LSU winning), not a 36-35 game!!! What was he thinking about!!

The Big10 was never considered as far as a BCS Championship Game participant.....

See....SEC...SEC...SEC.....

SvilleKid · 12-04-2011, 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by E.J.

The Big10 was never considered as far as a BCS Championship Game participant.....

See....SEC...SEC...SEC.....

I know that.... Duh... But the point is made as stated!!! It could also apply to the OkSt, but the Big Ten was in that situation several times in the past several years. Which WAS the point.

E.J. · 12-04-2011, 08:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SvilleKid

I know that.... Duh... But the point is made as stated!!! It could also apply to the OkSt, but the Big Ten was in that situation several times in the past several years. Which WAS the point.

So you were just bringing up 2007(Jan 2008)....4 years ago, the last time it was relevant?????

SEC....SEC....SEC....

ninjavanish · 12-04-2011, 08:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by E.J.

So you were just bringing up 2007(Jan 2008)....4 years ago, the last time it was relevant?????

SEC....SEC....SEC....

I think the point is that the Big Ten is irrelevant.

E.J. · 12-04-2011, 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninjavanish

I think the point is that the Big Ten is irrelevant.

I can agree with that.... Though I honestly believe that Urban Meyer will change that quickly, to my dismay....

ninjavanish · 12-04-2011, 09:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by E.J.

I can agree with that.... Though I honestly believe that Urban Meyer will change that quickly, to my dismay....

Well, I think that may be a good thing for the NCAA as a whole... assuming he is successful.

The thing to take away from today's selection is that there's obviously a struggle for all other conferences to have relevancy against the dominance of the SEC lately. (And to all of you nay-sayers, it doesn't matter at this point, the chips have fallen and make no mistake, there WILL BE a national champion from the SEC this season)

So for those who want to see more than one conference playing for the title... having someone like Urban Meyer go into the Big Ten is not a bad thing. However, I think there are plenty of great coaches outside the SEC. For the SEC, it's a chance to prove (or further prove) that it's perhaps not the coaches that make the difference, but our culture.

SvilleKid · 12-05-2011, 05:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by E.J.

So you were just bringing up 2007(Jan 2008)....4 years ago, the last time it was relevant?????

SEC....SEC....SEC....

Bye bye! Already have one ignored one on this thread. Let's just make it two. Don't argue with him, Ninja. He is just like Another here in that he wants to argue just to argue. Not worth the trouble. Arguing just to be arguing.

E.J. · 12-05-2011, 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SvilleKid

Bye bye! Already have one ignored one on this thread. Let's just make it two. Don't argue with him, Ninja. He is just like Another here in that he wants to argue just to argue. Not worth the trouble. Arguing just to be arguing.

So that is how it works.....

Personally, I thought I came in here with some good discussion, some numbers to back up my point/thoughts ect.... If I appear to be arguing just to argue, that was not the intent. Admittedly, the response to you had no point, other than to point out you were talking rubbish. What, you've brought up "the BIG10" and then "asking others not to play with the guy that doesn't think like you do....that will make him go away" Honestly, from what I have seen from you so far, it may be best if you did just ignore me.... It seems pretty clear that you'd probably be out of your league....so to speak....

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninjavanish

The thing to take away from today's selection is that there's obviously a struggle for all other conferences to have relevancy against the dominance of the SEC lately. (And to all of you nay-sayers, it doesn't matter at this point, the chips have fallen and make no mistake, there WILL BE a national champion from the SEC this season)

Quote:

Originally Posted by E.J.

Okay...yes, I can see how all other conferences having relevance or even trying to compete, well....there should probably be the SEC....SEC....SEC....and then D2.....

Quote:

Originally Posted by ninjavanish

Not sure I'm following you here, what are you trying to say?

The highlighted in red was what I was responding to.

ninjavanish · 12-05-2011, 10:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by E.J.

The highlighted in red was what I was responding to.

Quote:

The thing to take away from today's selection is that there's obviously a struggle for all other conferences to have relevancy against the dominance of the SEC lately.

Quote:

Originally Posted by E.J.

Okay...yes, I can see how all other conferences having relevance or even trying to compete, well....there should probably be the SEC....SEC....SEC....and then D2.....

I understand what your response was in regards to. It's the content of your reply that I'm not following you on. Is it to refute the dominance of the SEC in recent years? Or are you saying that all other conferences should be relegated to playing in Division II? That's where I'm confused.

OLS · 12-05-2011, 06:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by E.J.

So you were just bringing up 2007(Jan 2008)....4 years ago, the last time it was relevant?????

Just ignore him. He hasn't been rational for weeks. He only has new life now on the news that his team
is up for another butt-whippin in a month. It really is hilarious to watch. They don't recognize themselves
in the mirror. They ignore me and call me irrational because I cheer for the Purple and Gold and believed
them to be the best team in the country from week 1. Now in week 14, when no one in the country can
argue, they simply choose to tune it all out..lalala, lalala. 2nd place in the country just isn't good enough
when they are behind the cretins of LSU. Now for a month it's going to be "oh, you'll see, you guys escaped
with a narrow victory but WE were really the best team." Then they come into New Orleans and get it AGAIN.
MUCH longer ride home for contemplation this second time, boys.

But like I said, a mirror. Fan is abbreviation for fanatic. You folks are no better or worse than me. So for
the one that speaks in code, it has to be about character of the players. ONE character-istic we have that
will show itself is skillz.