|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Dear Lord, Thank You.
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Honestly, your statement is absolutely 100% incorrect on at least 20 different levels. Just my post alone invalidates your assertion. Completely. Just on lastibility alone Michaels beads win out by a huge margin, unless you plan to die tomorrow. ![]()
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
Plenty use RH/Heartfelt beads with no problems. Plenty use Shilala with no problems. For the 56% difference in price (at the pound level) I just can't justify "magic clay" at the moment. Don't get all butt hurt over opinion. *Edit: Some day (when my car isn't rear ended and my A/C didn't go out just days later on the house) when I have some spare cash to buy some "magic clay" beads I'll form my own opinion of them. Until then I'll have to suffer. ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Dear Lord, Thank You.
![]() |
![]() Quote:
![]() Like I said, everyone doesn't have to drink the Koolaid. It's okay. If you don't want any part of the beads, that's cool. I simply hope everyone tries them, because I know what they do, how they do it, and why they do it. I know the value. It just doesn't help anyone for you to claim things that are 100% wrong. As I mentioned before, all the information lies there for you to justify magic clay. All the test data has been posted in the wide open spaces from day one. If you choose not to look, that's fine. You yourself wanted to try them at my expense. I'd have done it in a minute if you were willing to read a little. You're clearly not willing to get educated about them. That's cool, too. It's your life, my brother. You can do and say whatever you like. ![]()
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
FWIW: I'm using KL. Last edited by Mindflux; 06-23-2010 at 09:18 AM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Dear Lord, Thank You.
![]() |
![]() Quote:
The "how they work" is because of how they are made and their physical properties. It's really interesting if you dig science. It's more like a colonoscopy if you're not. ![]() I can explain the difference between Kitty Litter and all the different grades of silica gel, too. It ain't rocket surgery, but it's still pretty boring. All the posts on creating the beads were at Club Stogie. That's where we developed them. It ain't Club Stogie anymore, and I haven't been back forever, so I don't know what's left of the info. They saved everything, to my knowledge. My screen name was the same there, so you could search that way.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Dear Lord, Thank You.
![]() |
![]() Quote:
Dave's beads will work really hard to control the RH to their setpoint though.That creates oddities that are really complicated, but the short answer is "Yup". It does defeat the flexibility of the shilala beads, because they can be changed to whatever setpoint you desire. If you use them with Dave's beads, they'll constantly try to assume those bead's setpoint. I always suggested that guys wait till they are ready for new beads and use all one kind. It's just easier than explaining what could happen, and it's good advice. ![]()
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |