|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Picked up 2 5vers of the Londres on Cbid right after I posted this and got some responses. Tried a couple last week, not bad! A little thinner in RG than I usually go for, but I was still a good smoke. Have 8 left, gonna try to let at least 4 of those age 5-6 months and see what they do.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Still Watching My Back
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I have read that all padrons are exactly the same blend with the 000 series being aged 2.5 years, 64 ann 4 years, 26 ann 5 years and family reserve 45 ann 10 years.
Does aging tobacco then rolling the cigars as padron does differ from rolling tobacco and aging the cigar? I guess my question is... If I age some 3000's for 3 years will it taste like a 26ann? I have heard the 000's age very well but the ann do not as they are already aged. The question is how well do the 000's age... |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |
The Hebrew Hammer
![]() |
![]() Quote:
The Padron Series (Thousand series) is one blend, '64 Anniversary is another, Serie 1926 is another. Even the Reserve '45 is almost the same blend of the 64 anniversary series with "a little bit changed" according to Cigar Aficionado.
__________________
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Thanks. Someone said they spoke to Jorge and he said they were all the same blend. I have been wondering if this was true. Would have been nice if some aged 000's would taste like a 1926...
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Will work for Boli GM's
Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Marc
Location: Lost in translation...near Newnan, GA
Posts: 1,417
Trading: (23)
![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
Try the 1964 PAN's & PAM's, and the Serie 1926 (Mad or Nat)...they're really great cigars...
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I like the 3000 and 6000 a lot. Do not try the 1964 or 1926 lines though
![]() |
![]() |