|
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Gravy Boat Winnah.
![]() Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Pete
Location: my attorney has advised against giving this information to insane people
Posts: 5,326
Trading: (22)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() Quote:
Considering smoke isn't 'alive' I don't know what a short burst of uv light is going to have on it. I am certain that UV sterilization works for organisms, but pushing it to "kill" smoke seems a stretch. Tobii pointed me to these units, which seem like a decent cleaner for the money (which is more than I can afford right now anyway, so the point is fairly moot) but they do seem to work well, and are based on a fairly popular platform from Toshiba, as I recall my google-fu told me. http://www.rabbitair.com/minusa2-spa...-purifier.aspx |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
Yes, if you go to the site listed above, they review two Rabbit units. Not bad, for a 200sqf room, but mine's twice the size. The site rates them higher, but I want 7-8 turnovers per hour.
I agree about the UV on smoke, as I have learned more overnight. I got bad info from a filter salesman on the UV. Carbon is what will filter out the smoke. I knew that smoke actually attaches itself to bulbs rather quickly, so I guess it makes sense to remove the UV from the equation. Last edited by Joseywales; 11-25-2009 at 07:51 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
I think I'm normal...
|
![]() Quote:
Edit: After writing this I checked out my sources (Wikipedia) and they back me up. Check it out here. It's under the heading of air purification
__________________
I eat gummy bears by tearing them limb from limb and eating their heads last. |
|
![]() |
![]() |