|
|
![]() |
#1 |
I barely grok the obvious
|
![]()
I meant to say that but what I actually said was, "Some sonsabinnitchers are too lazy to empty and clean a half smoked pipe before turning in for the night."
And, sonnnavabinnitcher, I did it again yesterday with half a bowl of 1792/Dark Kendall Flake. In fact it smoked about the same as the day before once the pipe got warmed up. Punchy stuff, fresh or stale. ![]()
__________________
"I hope you had the time of your life." |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
![]() To quote Roberto Duran... "No mas!" |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]() Quote:
I'm a newbie, and the only tin I own is the 1792, just bought it a few days ago. I have smoked one bowl but is was a 50/50 mixture 1792 and 2010 a bulk McClelland blend, a straight VA flake.... It was good, but I didnt get the physchedelic trip Hydrated did when he tried the 1792. I'm looking foprward to trying the 1792 straight, Hydrated, I read your review, and was a little nervous about smoking it straight, but hey If Moo can smoke it straight, Im thinking alls good ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
I barely grok the obvious
|
![]()
I don't happen to like high-nicotine intake. I love coffee but don't actually drink a lot of it. Same with pipes tobak - I like the stuff but I don;t smoke five bowls/day, either.
I have read a lot of comments about the nicotine kick-butted'ness of the 1792. I found it VERY punchy in the flavor department but not dizzy-making or barf-inducing in strength. Now, it is strong-ish but, I think, the nicotine content (whatever it is) PLUS the very full bodied flavor PLUS the propensity of this flake to make A LOT of smoke conspire to make 1792 more than the sum of its parts. That said, I wouldn't start with my biggest pipe, on an empty stomach, first thing in the morning. ![]()
__________________
"I hope you had the time of your life." |
![]() |
![]() |