|
|
View Poll Results: Should Pete Rose be in the Hall of Fame? | |||
Rose should be in the Hall. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
62 | 65.26% |
Rose should not be in the Hall. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
20 | 21.05% |
Depends (discuss below). |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 7.37% |
I could care less. |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 6.32% |
Voters: 95. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#1 |
Big Drunkin Monkey!!
|
![]()
He gambled, so what...he didn't fix any games and it doesn't make his astounding accomplishments any less...he is one of the greatest players of all times and needs to be in!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Just in from the Storm
|
![]()
I voted "It depends". If the other HOF members are OK with him in, let him in. If they don't, he stays out. Pete Rose was a great baseball player. I don't think anyone would disagree with that statement. But, there are other qualifying factors to get into the HOF. I think Bud Selig should lift the ban, and let the voters decide if he should be admitted. Until Selig lifts the ban, nothing is going to happen.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
Fatter than you!
Join Date: Oct 2008
First Name: Larry
Location: A little place called home.
Posts: 5,397
Trading: (44)
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]()
If he would have admitted to betting on his team immediately would this even be a question? Or is it just because he denied it?
![]() He clearly has the numbers to put in his own wing in the Hall of Fame. Not sure another player can rival the numbers he put up or the passion with which he played the game. ![]()
__________________
If we weren't supposed to eat animals, then how come they're made of meat? You can never have too many cigars, they are like an investment in good times. ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |