|
|
![]() |
#1 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
![]()
I personally like the 92FS. I have shot many of them over the years, and have owned a few. I would recommend them to anyone. They are very accurate, and there is probably a reason that once upon a time a majority of the LEO's, and military carried them. I have seen pictures of the ninety two, but have never held one. They do interest me thou.
As far as them not being in the league of a Sig they are correct. I sold my last 92 to pick up a Sig P229, and loved that gun. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Adjusting to the Life
|
![]()
Alright, I knew these things always end up with a Sig love fest. I do like the sigs I have held (never shot) but always wondered why they cost so much. At the gun show last weekend, they had a sig 226 9mm that was a certified pre-owned that looked new. The guy selling it (dealer) was saying that Sig basically replaces replaces internals/ refinishes the gun to new condition. Anyone have experience with a Sig CPO? The price was $599 so it is actually cheaper than the 92FS....
I like the larger grip of the 92 (bigger hands) but really need to shoot them to decide... I'd just get them both, but I'd have to spend big $ on the wife to prevent castration. |
![]() |
![]() |