|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
The Homebrew Hammer
|
I've never had a 40th or an 80th, just too expensive for me to justify the purchase although I've been tempted just to try them.
You didn't ask , but I do prefer the 26th over the PAM64 series. To me the PAM is just like a deeper, richer version of the x000 (M) series so it all comes down to value: I have a good supply of the x000, so I don't typically pick up a PAM at the B&M. The 26th is a very different smoke--flavorful, complex, well balanced and perfectly constructed.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Have My Own Room
|
Quote:
Padron 1926 Padron 1964 Padron 40th Padron 80th? I have only smoked the 1964 (not impressive) and have seen the 1926's, but I don't think I know what a 40th or 80th is.
__________________
Artillery Lends Dignity to What Would Otherwise Be a Vulgar Brawl |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
The Homebrew Hammer
|
The 40th & 80th are limited releases in the 1926 line. They retail for about $25 and $30 per stick (box price) respectively, compared to about $20/stick of a comparable vitola in the 1926 line. Not entirely sure of the differences--as Dave points out, they're all rolled from the same tobacco but with different aging. And CA named the 40th Cigar of the Year some time ago. I think that might be one of the reasons why Bruce started the thread--to discuss what the differences might be, especially to warrant the higher price.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Feeling at Home
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|