Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity?

Cincymike · 08-28-2013, 08:41 AM

My preference has been 38-46 ring for many, many years. Probably 75% of the smokes I burn fall in this range. I wish this new trend toward jaw-breakers would reverse, as some of the cigars I would like to try do not offer smaller vitolas.

4theLoveofCedar · 08-28-2013, 09:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cincymike

My preference has been 38-46 ring for many, many years. Probably 75% of the smokes I burn fall in this range. I wish this new trend toward jaw-breakers would reverse, as some of the cigars I would like to try do not offer smaller vitolas.

Agreed 100%. I smoke the occasional robusto or torpedo/belicoso up to a 52, but overwhelmingly prefer less than 50 RG.

08-28-2013, 08:41 AM	#1
Cincymike grumpy senior in training Join Date: Aug 2013 First Name: Mike Location: Cincinnati, OH Posts: 46 Trading: (0)	Re: Smaller ring gauges = less flavor complexity? My preference has been 38-46 ring for many, many years. Probably 75% of the smokes I burn fall in this range. I wish this new trend toward jaw-breakers would reverse, as some of the cigars I would like to try do not offer smaller vitolas.