Recommendations for myself

[PearlS4]

Originally Posted by N2 GOLD

Anything Padron...

Padrons for sure, I love the 64's. Try some of the Tatuaje lines, the Liga Privada lines, and for one that's a bit under the radar, La Riqueza #4's

[iaMkcK]

Originally Posted by PearlS4

Padrons for sure, I love the 64's. Try some of the Tatuaje lines, the Liga Privada lines, and for one that's a bit under the radar, La Riqueza #4's

Smoked some LPs & Tats.. Got some LPs, Tatuajes & La Riqueza #4s in the humi -- and some Liga Privadas on the way. :-)

Thanks everyone for all the suggestions as of yet. It's truly appreciated. I'm currently making a shopping list of where to buy all the cigars mentioned and what have you. :-)

[pnoon]

Originally Posted by iaMkcK

@Bob -- I was gonna get a Padron 1964 last night since my lounge just got boxes in. Cheapest one was $26.99 before tax. I passed, as Famous-Smoke would provide me with a cheaper price point. Annnndd, I'm scared of the Camacho Triple Mad.

@Rob -- Trust me, I know. That's why this post was LOADED with disclaimers. Life is just too short to smoke a bad cigar. :-)

@Tony -- I've got 5 Illusiones in the Humi. 2 of them are some 2009's Singulaires purchased when released and properly stored since. I want to smoke one, but I am waiting for a special occasion -- Much like the 2 Tatuaje Cojonu 2003s that have been aged for years that I got.. I see a trend of Kristoff, they are next on my hitlist. I have a DPG in the humi, and I have been dying to try the 601 Blue Robustos -- There is a thread on here with people just RAVING about them. I will keep that on my next purchasing list. Never even heard of San Lotano or seen the label. I'll keep my eye out.

And I refreshed before posting and seen Rob posted, to which I must say

@Rob -- Oh yes sir, that's the general consensus.. Got to just pull the trigger..

Originally Posted by iaMkcK

@Adam -- Right on, I'll check out some of the Padron Maduro X000s, and that PAM64 is on my hitlist. I've been meaning to grab some more LPs, but as of right now.. I must wait*. I'll look out for the AFs mentioned. I still need to put up those pictures from when I smoked the Dirty Rat!

@Jared -- I'm writing these names down as well.. Oh, and honestly, I got that cigar exactly 35 days after I started smoking. Next week I will be getting a shipment of another Único Serie.. Which will be explained in the asterisk! :-D

@Bob -- For sure, I'll remember. :-)

@Rico -- Hahah, right on man :-)

* At the end of this week, I'll be receiving a box of FFPs and also a 5er of Undercrown Gran Toros. So, my horizons will expand a bit further.

We are NOT Twitter. Ditch the @ bull$hit.

Convention here is to quote the person's post to whom you are addressing/responding. Also, by quoting the post, it lends context to your response without the reader having to go back and read the post of the person you are responding to.

[DaBear]

Originally Posted by pnoon

We are NOT Twitter. Ditch the @ bull$hit.

Convention here is to quote the person's post to whom you are addressing/responding. Also, by quoting the post, it lends context to your response without the reader having to go back and read the post of the person you are responding to.

I honestly dont see the problem with what he's doing. The @ thing is keeping the thread from getting spammed from him responding to every post.

Anywho, on topic, I would say the MUWAT+11s if you can find them and any Tat with the Reserva wrapper would be up your alley.

[T.G]

Originally Posted by DaBear

I honestly dont see the problem with what he's doing. The @ thing is keeping the thread from getting spammed from him responding to every post.

Could just as easily use the multi-quote function and insert replies in between the individual quotes. The biggest advantage is that it saves a lot of scrolling up and down to see the context that the reply was referring to, since as this isn't twitter, a decent percentage of the people here are actually interested in reading more responses than just their own / those directed towards them. With 5 or 6 quotes allowed per post, it wouldn't clutter up the thread any more than the nearly incomprehensible replies with all the @, $, %, ‡, ∙, ¬, ™, š, Ð, #tigerblood stuff in them.

[DaBear]

Originally Posted by T.G

Could just as easily use the multi-quote function and insert replies in between the individual quotes. The biggest advantage is that it saves a lot of scrolling up and down to see the context that the reply was referring to, since as this isn't twitter, a decent percentage of the people here are actually interested in reading more responses than just their own / those directed towards them. With 5 or 6 quotes allowed per post, it wouldn't clutter up the thread any more than the nearly incomprehensible replies with all the @, $, %, ‡, ∙, ¬, ™, š, Ð, #tigerblood stuff in them.

For the record, I'm not so sure everyone even knows how to use the multi-quote, as I still haven't figured it out and have been here quite awhile, so I wouldn't assume a guy whos been here just shy of two months tops to have it all figured out. Not trying to start a fight or anything, just sayin how I see it. The @ thing is much simpler and less time consuming than quoting each post and copy-pasting it into another window/tab as I've done a number of times.

[T.G]

Originally Posted by DaBear

For the record, I'm not so sure everyone even knows how to use the multi-quote, as I still haven't figured it out and have been here quite awhile, so I wouldn't assume a guy whos been here just shy of two months tops to have it all figured out.

It takes about 6 seconds to figure out... on a bad day, with a hangover, on a 14.4 dial up, running mosaic.

Originally Posted by T.G

That is precisely the reason why the multi-quote function is great. Hit the multi-quote button (the " button to the right of the QUOTE button) for each of the posts you wish to respond to, then on the final one, click quote, and they will all be individually quoted in a single new post in the advanced editor. You don't have to scroll or keep track of posts to reply to either, you just insert your replies between the quoted posts.

And now you know.

Originally Posted by DaBear

Not trying to start a fight or anything, just sayin how I see it. The @ thing is much simpler and less time consuming than quoting each post and copy-pasting it into another window/tab as I've done a number of times.

We already covered this, four times. Furthermore, the @herpderp works on twitter because of the automatic conversation threading, Over there, it's quite easy to actually bring up the post that was being responded to along with the entire conversation, so things actually are in context and make sense.
Here... not so much.

But hey, if you wish to be obtuse about understanding the differences between the sites, their format and conventions along with how the use of @herpderp nonsense yields exceptionally poor quality and hard to understand posts here, go for it.