Bcs - wtf 2011

rizzle · 12-06-2011, 08:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by E.J.

You keep coming back to this as if it is somehow relevant, IMO it is not. I don't know who is better. I know they played....and one team won and one team lost and that is that....

I could not care less if the masses would say the better team didn't win the game....who cares? They played the game and there was a winner and a loser, you move on from there.

As of Monday December 5, 2011 - LSU > Alabama

It IS relevant for the basis of this whole freaking conversation, IMO.

My part in this converstion has nothing to do with the fact that LSU > Alabama. I'm saying that just because Alabama isn't number 1 doesn't mean they can't be number 2. And for the BCS championship game, that is all that matters.

As of Monday December 5, 2011 - Alabama > Oklahoma State

E.J. · 12-06-2011, 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rizzle

As of Monday December 5, 2011 - Alabama > Oklahoma State

Because they have not played, your saying that is purely assumption. Again, it is why we play the games....

rizzle · 12-06-2011, 08:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by E.J.

Because they have not played, your saying that is purely assumption. Again, it is why we play the games....

Then get it scheduled. I would love to wipe the field with T Boone's boys.

I've got a really good article I'll post in a few after I find it. You guys know that the SEC proposed a +1 system already and that the ACC was the only conference to agree, right? We already tried to remedy this. Problem is, nobody screams foul about it until they're directly affected.

It'll all change after the contract runs out in 2013. God can only hope they somehow get it right. But for the next two years we're stuck with it.

E.J. · 12-06-2011, 08:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rizzle

Then get it scheduled. I would love to wipe the field with T Boone's boys.

I've got a really good article I'll post in a few after I find it. You guys know that the SEC proposed a +1 system already and that the ACC was the only conference to agree, right? We already tried to remedy this. Problem is, nobody screams foul about it until they're directly affected.

It'll all change after the contract runs out in 2013. God can only hope they somehow get it right. But for the next two years we're stuck with it.

I read that article, it was pretty good....and you're right, nobody came to the table to support the idea...