Official SEC Football Thread 2011

OLS · 11-12-2011, 04:07 PM

Wow, this is almost the same as what happened with Rizzle. You make arguments that have nothing to do with
the point. Maybe I do the same thing, who knows. I am not upset about Saban being at Alabama. I don't care
where you guys got him. I am saying that teams that believe in Win At Any Cost pay a coach more than any coach
in history to that point. That's my point. I don't care why you hired him, that's for the board of whatevers to decide.

As for players that are "bad apples" or whatever term you might want to use, again, I am not saying that there
are specific players, the point I am making, and likely made elsewhere is that you guys go for the top recruits and you
get a lot of em. I doubt you do an exhaustive background check. Every team in the highest level of NCAA success likely
has a statistically accurate sample of players, good character and low character. I don't claim we are better than
anyone else at the top. I am just saying there is no way in hell that UA has only the good boys. That's naive and
ridiculous. And how perfectly can I make my point? Thank you Jerry Sandusky. Penn St. has never had a HINT of
trouble with the NCAA, and has been held up for DECADES as being the best of the best in how to do it right. I am guessing
I don't have to remind you what is going on up there right now.

11-12-2011, 04:07 PM	#1
OLS Suck It Join Date: Oct 2008 First Name: Brad Location: TN Posts: 7,912 Trading: (19)	Re: Official SEC Football Thread 2011 Wow, this is almost the same as what happened with Rizzle. You make arguments that have nothing to do with the point. Maybe I do the same thing, who knows. I am not upset about Saban being at Alabama. I don't care where you guys got him. I am saying that teams that believe in Win At Any Cost pay a coach more than any coach in history to that point. That's my point. I don't care why you hired him, that's for the board of whatevers to decide. As for players that are "bad apples" or whatever term you might want to use, again, I am not saying that there are specific players, the point I am making, and likely made elsewhere is that you guys go for the top recruits and you get a lot of em. I doubt you do an exhaustive background check. Every team in the highest level of NCAA success likely has a statistically accurate sample of players, good character and low character. I don't claim we are better than anyone else at the top. I am just saying there is no way in hell that UA has only the good boys. That's naive and ridiculous. And how perfectly can I make my point? Thank you Jerry Sandusky. Penn St. has never had a HINT of trouble with the NCAA, and has been held up for DECADES as being the best of the best in how to do it right. I am guessing I don't have to remind you what is going on up there right now.