Games thread!

[Starscream]

Originally Posted by VirtualSmitty

I can see where you are coming from. But in all fairness to LoS it is a reboot of the franchise. It has no connection to the story line of old, and it is the first really good 3d CV. I think it was needed, they really played out the Metroid style games, and there has been slim pickings on the old school style (two titles in the last five years!), it's worth a rent at least. The story is excellent, it is much longer than most action games these days, and there are a few cool nods to the CVs of old.

I'm not knocking the game itself, but I just don't see why they stamped Castlevania on the title. Mario didn't need a revamp, neither has Zelda. Why can't Simon Belmont (or any Belmont and the whip) be a part of the videogame canon too? Like I said, the game looks great, and another plus b/c Patrick Stewart is the narrator, but the Castlevania series to me is 1-4, SOTN, and Rondo of Blood (and the two new side-scroller downloads on Wii and PS3).

[Hippi3Slay3r]

Originally Posted by andysutherland

but the Castlevania series to me is 1-4, SOTN.

SOTN was the S#1T my friends and I would come home after school (8th grade allmost 14 years ago ) and spend hours trying to unlock the max percentage of the map. Our record was 219%


p.s. the Crissagram sword was bad a$$