|
|
![]() |
#1 |
WiP!?
|
![]()
Why not? For arguments sake, let's say i'm Pete Johnson. My Tatuaje cigars are the talk of the town right now and I want people to think of them as a super premium cigar along the likes of Davidoff. So to maintain that image I set price limitations for what retailers can charge. If they don't like it they don't have to buy it. I don't want people buying brown label tats for half price, if they want something cheaper I want them buying the white label tats. How is it fair if I allow a small shop to undercharge for my product when I have large volume accounts that play by the rules? Isn't that unfair to the people giving me the most business?
__________________
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid - Benjamin Franklin |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | |
Crazy like a fox
|
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Lets Go Buckeyes!
![]() |
![]() Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Opa!!
![]() |
![]()
Retailers should do what is in the best interest to them, and that is make their customer happy. Advertise the MSRP but if you decide you want to let some B/SOTL's buy at a lesser price that is fine IMO. The manufacturer gets his money up front, it is the B&M that has to deal with selling it to get profit. Why sell a cigar that isn't popular anymore at the same price when you know you could attract people by lowering the price. Basically the manufacturer is handcuffing the retailer unfairly.
__________________
"If I give a businessman 10,000 francs, what is that to him, he is rich. But if I give him a Cohiba cigar, that is style."-Hotel Rwanda |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
Crazy like a fox
|
![]()
No finger pointing guys. I am sure no one here did anything out of spite, vengeance or anything else. If this falls into a finger pointing contest the real message of protect the great retailers falls through the cracks. Thats the only takeaway this thread should have, no scarlet letters.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|