|
|
|
|
|
#1 |
|
NinfaManiac
|
Agreed Xubuntu is very light. I prefer Gnome.
I have used Ubuntu on a system that had a 1Ghz processor and 128MB of RAM with no trouble at all. Slowness here and there, but what do you expect when running a modern operating system on a dinosaur PC? You can always install the standard Ubuntu and then just install XFCE after the fact, if it is slow.
__________________
Any cigars portrayed in this post that appear to be Cuban in origin are completely fictional in nature. Any resemblance between these cigars and actual Cuban cigars is unintended and coincidental. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Crotchety Geezer
|
I've always found PCLOS to be much faster than X/K/Ubuntu. You can choose KDE/XFCE/Gnome as the windows manager with PCLOS pretty easily. Mint and Mepis are also excellent distros to try. I'm running PCLOS 2009 on an IBM X20 PIII 650 with 386MB RAM no problems.
__________________
How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat? |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
#PretentiousBastage
|
PCLOS 2009 is really sweet. Ran it under virtual box for a while to play around with it. I might have to try to partition some space off and run it full blown for a while!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
I'm on Mepis now. I migrated from SuSE. I like any debian linux better than the RPM based ones. Ubuntu based debians are a little harder to keep bleeding edge upgraded than raw debian. I've messed around with Solaris, SCO, IRIX, HPUX, and different *BSDs and I like what I've got now. But that said, I have to agree with the above comment by rennD.
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|