[emopunker2004]

Originally Posted by ols

i wanted to add, justin, that while you are right as rain, ironically in low light conditions, the d90
is almost as bad as the d200. It starts getting really squirrelly in high iso situations, blasting
out color blooms and just pouring on the saturation. It seems to freak itself out. So in normal to lower
light conditions, it is fine, but you put it in a dim basement music stage sitcho, and neither camera is
really up to the task, if you intend to show your photos to anyone. The d90 looks a lot better at iso1000
than the d200, but when it gets to 1600, it is beginning to come apart. Which in a way it should, that is
it's ceiling basically. But there is iq and there is iq. At 1250-1600, the d200 is still giving you the same
photo, just noisier. That is not the case with the d90. But now that i know this, i can turn the color
settings to totally neutral next time i try to shoot d90 in low light.

d700