Re: Montecristo #2 - fake? :(
Quote:
Originally Posted by markem
I've either done or been present at dissections that showed:
road tar
rubber (assumed from a shoe of some kind)
string unlike any used in cigar manufacture (think "women's products")
mold
strange substances that had a urine-like smell (could have been plant fiber)
rat or mouse droppings
charcoal
dirt
rocks
plenty that no one had a guess for although one person thought one was poison oak
So, by all means, smoke it. But don't blame me for the results.
|
That is some nasty mojo. Makes sense as since it's fake it's not like they have any stake in the brand or a reputation at stake and it's just about making the cigar cheap. Stuff anything in that can be hidden by just enough tobacco to fool the consumer.
Wow.
__________________
Drink, pray, smoke, and work out.
|