mariogolbee

I'll make just a few points. I am mostly listing a few points against AND for. These points are meant for reference NOT for my own debate purposes. Good luck with the paper, you'll do fine.

If you are going to use any websites for information be sure they end in .edu or .gov rather than .com or .org. This way you are less likely to get biased sources. Sticking to .edu sites is best as some countries and/or agencies with .gov sites can be biased as well.

Guns don't kill people, people kill people, but people can easily kill other people with guns.

If there is a low rate of gun related deaths in this country, then why do people feel the need to protect themselves with guns from other people with guns?

A law abiding citizen who breaks the law is a criminal and a criminal was a law abiding citizen until they broke the law.

Although the right to bear arms was established for citizens to protect themselves from government, which SHOULD not be necessary in this era, the perceived threat of terrorist attacks is a good reason to be allowed arms.

MOST responsible firearm owners use them safely and only for recreational use.

Although I believed at one point that illegal firearms are mostly obtained through theft of legal firearms I have since found out this is not the case. However, there is still a good portion of illegal guns on the street that were stolen from their legal owners.

Guns are cool.