Quote:
Originally Posted by 357
I know many people fear the idea of cocked & locked, but IMO it is safer than a DAO (Double-Action Only) style pistol like a Glock. I know technically speaking Glocks' aren't a true DAO, but that is not the point of my statement. What I mean is they lack a true safety. My Kimber has a thumb safety, and a grip safety that deactivates a firing pin block. Modern 1911s are extremely safe to carry when cocked & locked. Also, I don't feel it is difficult to get used to flicking off the thumb safety while drawing a 1911. The grip safety is natually disengaged and disables the firing pin block. All that, and you get a very nice consistent trigger pull. The thing I don't like about D/S (Double-Single) action pistols like Sig's is that the first round (most important one) is a long hard double action pull, and each one after that is a light singled action pull. DAO pistols are consistent, but still a long and heavy trigger. That said I don't dislike D/S or DAO pistols, it's just something to think about before choosing a carry gun.
|
I pretty much agree with all of this. My point is only that repetitious practice is required to make flicking off the safety a reflex action in a high stress situation, and applying the safety when required. For my own use, I prefer the 1911 format to all others... I don't consider it to be unsafe practice to carry cocked and locked for a dedicated and well practiced shooter; but I fear that someone who carries but does not shoot or dry fire a lot, or the police officer with no interest in guns beyond twice yearly qualifying, may not incorporate the necessary "muscle memory" to operate a SA auto effectively and safely.
Cheers,
G