Cigar Asylum Cigar Forum

Cigar Asylum Cigar Forum (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/index.php)
-   Sports (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=57)
-   -   Bcs - wtf 2011 (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/showthread.php?t=51556)

rizzle 12-06-2011 10:31 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 357 (Post 1493978)
First, it's not impossible. See below. Plus, the end results doesn't matter. The debate is who should play who, not who won in the end.

Mike, I hate to point it out to you, but you just proved my point. See below as a cut and past of what you posted.

Quote:

The last week of the regular season was dynamic for the national championship race. Third-ranked Michigan remained idle. Fourth-ranked Florida faced No. 9 Arkansas in the SEC Championship, while No. 2 USC faced unranked, in-city rival UCLA. Both Florida and Michigan cheered as USC fell to UCLA 13–9. Florida defeated Arkansas to claim the 2006 SEC Championship Title. USC's loss knocked them out of contention, leaving No. 3 Michigan and No. 4 Florida as the most likely teams to earn the No. 2 ranking and face Ohio State for the BCS National Championship. The final BCS poll passed Florida over Michigan to take the No. 2 spot while Michigan remained unchanged at No. 3, with .0101 points separating the two teams. This small difference was a result of the human polls (the Coaches Poll and Harris Interactive Poll) ranking Florida above Michigan while the computer polls had the two teams tied for second.
1 played 2 for the championship game. Always.


Quote:

Clearly the theory that "voters" feel that a team who failed to win their own conference should be excluded from playing in a national title game is BUNK. They forgot to exclude non-conference winning 1-loss SEC teams. :rolleyes:

My point is a rematch reeks of an SEC bias. The Big-10 didn't get that chance in 2006. Why should the SEC get it now? Overall my point is pretty well summed up by E.J.

Nobody in their right mind thought Boise State could be Oklahoma in 2007 but it happened. Alabama had their chance to beat LSU. Time for someone else to get a chance. LSU-Alabama was settled on the field. NEXT!
And that's what makes college ball so great, ain't it? We still owe y'all for the 2000 Orange Bowl, by the way. See you in Dallas next September. :tu

E.J. 12-06-2011 10:35 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
^^^...and the loser of that BIG10 Championship game....what BCS game are they going to?

OLS 12-06-2011 10:40 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rizzle (Post 1493970)
Oh, I still think we have the better team. Don't you? -(P

I realize this is bravado mixed with sarcasm, but no, not a bit. Until you can come into my house and
make a field goal to win a game, and not have your misses be just blind bad luck, but consistent failure,
there is no way bama is better. Saban is not the only person in the football world who knew going in
it was likely he was going to have to make a lot of field goals. LSU is not sisters of the poor.
And yet he consistently forced his kicker to take these wildly out-of-range shots at the uprights.
So maybe we even have a better COACH than you guys. You guys had THE Trent Richardson, you should
have GONE FOR IT on 4th down.

-(P you are deluded, hoss, lol.

longknocker 12-06-2011 11:24 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
I Think Most People Think Saban Has Been A Better Coach Than Miles Over Their Lifetimes, Brad.:) I Will Admit You Have Better Special Teams, But I Feel We Have A Better Offense & Defense. We'll See How It Plays Out Jan.9th In The "Neutral" (What A Joke! :r) Site Of New Orleans!:tu

OLS 12-06-2011 11:36 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by longknocker (Post 1494021)
I Think Most People Think Saban Has Been A Better Coach Than Miles Over Their Lifetimes, Brad.:) I Will Admit You Have Better Special Teams, But I Feel We Have A Better Offense & Defense. We'll See How It Plays Out Jan.9th In The "Neutral" (What A Joke! :r) Site Of New Orleans!:tu

AND there it is..., lol. I was WAITING so long for someone to say that. haha
A.) We can't control the venue for the NCG. We have coincidentally been crowned champ in every year we
played in the dome for all the marbles. That is true.
B.) You ain't Boise St.....you are only driving to New Orleans. You will have access to as many tickets
as we do. I don't need to remind you the argument I got into over the pitiful tickets we got for the
Bama-LSU matchup in T-town. I was schooled on that one, though.
C.) New Orleans is not Baton Rouge by a long shot, in any way, except the state it's in and the fact
that there are some cajuns there. There are cajuns in Tuscaloosa. 90-minutes for us, about double
that for you.

haha, OK, got that out of my system. On to Saban - Miles. I think without researching that Miles has a
much better winning percentage over his tenure at LSU than Nickie did, and I think it is also better than
Nickie's at Bama. THINK. But what an excellent point....RESEARCH, here I go, lol.

rizzle 12-06-2011 11:40 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by E.J. (Post 1493986)
I think I understand, I am just having discussion, attempting to show another side. People don't have to agree, but there is no doubt that it has to have them think. It is why I have qualified many times that I really feel there are many here that have an inability to look at this objectivly.



So who goes to the Rose Bowl, the conference champion? Not that it matters, just making a point...:r:r:

:tu

Who cares for $100, Alex? :r:r

longknocker 12-06-2011 11:41 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLS (Post 1494033)
AND there it is..., lol. I was WAITING so long for someone to say that. haha
A.) We can't control the venue for the NCG. We have coincidentally been crowned champ in every year we
played in the dome for all the marbles. That is true.
B.) You ain't Boise St.....you are only driving to New Orleans. You will have access to as many tickets
as we do. I don't need to remind you the argument I got into over the pitiful tickets we got for the
Bama-LSU matchup in T-town. I was schooled on that one, though.
C.) New Orleans is not Baton Rouge by a long shot, in any way, except the state it's in and the fact
that there are some cajuns there. There are cajuns in Tuscaloosa. 90-minutes for us, about double
that for you.
haha, OK, got that out of my system. On to Saban - Miles. I think without researching that Miles has a
much better winning percentage over his tenure at LSU than Nickie did, and I think it is also better than
Nickie's at Bama. THINK. But what an excellent point....RESEARCH, here I go, lol.


Go For It!:r Look At Coaching Records Over Their Entire Careers, Brad!:tu

357 12-06-2011 11:41 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rizzle (Post 1493987)
Mike, I hate to point it out to you, but you just proved my point. See below as a cut and past of what you posted.


1 played 2 for the championship game. Always.




And that's what makes college ball so great, ain't it? We still owe y'all for the 2000 Orange Bowl, by the way. See you in Dallas next September. :tu

Problem is the system is garbage so they had to "massage" the final rankings to avoid a rematch in the final. Strangely this time they won't message the rankings and are willing to let the SEC have a rematch. No rematch for the Big10, but the SEC gets one. Hmmmm.

The system is flawed, but they made the right move last time by tweaking the rankings to avoid a rematch. This year their SEC bias is preventing them from doing what is right.

rizzle 12-06-2011 11:47 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLS (Post 1493994)
I realize this is bravado mixed with sarcasm, but no, not a bit. Until you can come into my house and
make a field goal to win a game, and not have your misses be just blind bad luck, but consistent failure,
there is no way bama is better. Saban is not the only person in the football world who knew going in
it was likely he was going to have to make a lot of field goals. LSU is not sisters of the poor.
And yet he consistently forced his kicker to take these wildly out-of-range shots at the uprights.
So maybe we even have a better COACH than you guys. You guys had THE Trent Richardson, you should
have GONE FOR IT on 4th down.

-(P you are deluded, hoss, lol.

But, but, but...Les Miles wears a dumb looking hat and eats grass, hoss. We'll be in your house shortly and we'll see what happens. Should be another good game.

OLS 12-06-2011 11:54 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
"Miles goes into the 2011 season with a record at LSU of 62-17, including a 33-15 mark in SEC regular season games.
Miles is the fastest coach in LSU history to reach milestone victories of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 games. "


That quote alone precludes Saban from having been that record-holder, so even though I think it is currently
a small diffrential, I believe that Miles is better all around in LSU records and likely had a better record than Saban for
what, "first 4 years at the school" type records. Of course, Saban got to bama in somewhat of a disarray and
Saban left miles a full cupboard. That affected their first year's totals a good bit. But the statement Les can only
win with Saban's recruits has been roundly proven illegitimate as you can very well see. He is about to win his
second Nat. Champ. if you don't mind me saying so. But I have to state for the record in this thread what I have
ALWAYS said, I am not someone who blames Saban for leaving. his average "years at school" is a measly 2.5
over his career. There were some doofus fans that had to throw up a sign that denigrated him on his
return to BR some years back, but Miles is and has been a fan favorite that never gives us any reason to look
back at Saban and think, "if only we had nick saban..."

OLS 12-06-2011 12:00 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
One at a time, lol. YES we anxiously await you guys at the Dome. No doubt gonna be must-see TV for at least
two fan bases....

TWO, what across all TWO teams of his career?? 90-38. Not as good as Saban, but only time will tell.
He has Saban beat %-wise so far over Saban at LSU and certainly at Bama. Where can he go from here?

See?? again with the waiting. i can't believe I have ALL through SHOPPING season, Christmas, NEW YEARS
and being too fat from all of it before I even see a PROMO for this game. RE-tarded.

357 12-06-2011 12:03 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Wait, if you're counting Saban wins don't forget you have to vacate a few for NCAA violations...

:tf

Stephen 12-06-2011 12:06 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLS (Post 1494058)
"Miles goes into the 2011 season with a record at LSU of 62-17, including a 33-15 mark in SEC regular season games.
Miles is the fastest coach in LSU history to reach milestone victories of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 games. "


That quote alone precludes Saban from having been that record-holder, so even though I think it is currently
a small diffrential, I believe that Miles is better all around in LSU records and likely had a better record than Saban for
what, "first 4 years at the school" type records. Of course, Saban got to bama in somewhat of a disarray and
Saban left miles a full cupboard. That affected their first year's totals a good bit. But the statement Les can only
win with Saban's recruits has been roundly proven illegitimate as you can very well see. He is about to win his
second Nat. Champ. if you don't mind me saying so. But I have to state for the record in this thread what I have
ALWAYS said, I am not someone who blames Saban for leaving. his average "years at school" is a measly 2.5
over his career. There were some doofus fans that had to throw up a sign that denigrated him on his
return to BR some years back, but Miles is and has been a fan favorite that never gives us any reason to look
back at Saban and think, "if only we had nick saban..."

And yet there were many a public outry to can him after 2009. Go figure.:sh

OLS 12-06-2011 12:11 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by longknocker (Post 1494021)
We'll See How It Plays Out Jan.9th In The "Neutral" (What A Joke! :r) Site Of New Orleans!:tu

Sorry, the Hoover-Met was plumb booked up that weekend. Tractor pull and all.
Haha, get over it, If I polled 100% of likely Bama bowl attendees, 95% of them would rather ride to
New Orleans to see the game than any venue in the state of Alabama...come on, it's NEW ORLEANS!
My God, can you IMAGINE what that joint is gonna be like. VERY neutral site. Sure, if we were playing
Wisconsin, it might be a little slanted towards Purple and gold in the seats, but you guys are gonna travel
well. I hope they restrict it to sides so there is a stark LINE of red and purple. ANd I hope even more
that they slant the split to give eatch team an entire endzone, or even half it perpendicular to the field.

rizzle 12-06-2011 12:19 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 357 (Post 1494064)
Wait, if you're counting Saban wins don't forget you have to vacate a few for NCAA violations...

:tf

Y'all be cheating smack. Love it. :tu
Quote:

Originally Posted by Stephen (Post 1494068)
And yet there were many a public outry to can him after 2009. Go figure.:sh

Hold on a cotton picking minute...that's just revisionist history. Go ask any level headed LSU fan. They all loved him from day one. Especially his time management skills :noon

You know, I laugh at him all the time, but he's obviously a good coach. The SEC is better for having him. Just another character to add to the mix. He's like the crazy uncle at Thanksgiving dinner.

357 12-06-2011 01:44 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
More fun for you SEC fanboys...

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoot...-in-on-the-fun

Quote:

No football conference has been more successful than the Southeastern Conference -- or as dirty.

While the SEC's run of five consecutive BCS titles and seven national championships in the past 13 seasons is unprecedented in college football, so is the number of major NCAA infractions the league has accumulated.

Since the league expanded to 12 schools for the 1992 season, the SEC's football programs have committed more major infractions than any other conference.

S-E-C! S-E-C!

As part of this five-part CBSSports.com series on cheating in college football, we look at which conferences and schools have cheated the most. Beginning in 1987 -- to coincide with SMU receiving the Death Penalty -- the SEC leads all conferences in major infractions with 13.

Since 1987, 10 of the SEC's 12 football programs have committed major infractions, according to the NCAA. The league's only football programs without a major infraction since 1987 are LSU (its last major infraction came in 1986) and Vanderbilt (which has never had a major infraction).

Alabama and Texas Tech, a former Southwest Conference school and current Big 12 member, have committed the most major infractions since 1987 with three each.

...
I guess they really do believe that if you're not cheating your not trying.

Should I bring up the academic standards (or lack thereof)?

:tf

Powers 12-06-2011 01:55 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rizzle (Post 1494080)
You know, I laugh at him all the time, but he's obviously a good coach. The SEC is better for having him. Just another character to add to the mix. He's like the crazy uncle at Thanksgiving dinner.

My sentiments exactly. I admitted I initially thought he was a lucky SOB whose luck would eventually win out, which ironically is what a lot of people thought about Tebow in the NFL. Turns out we're both wrong. Miles, like Tebow, is a winner and no matter how sloppy sometimes.

While I now acknowledge him as an elite coach, I still like to sometimes laugh kindheartedly at his quirks and eccentricities. 'Course I think that's one of my favorite things about meeting and getting to know new people, quirky character traits are what make life fun :tu

(But I he's still the luckiest SOB on the planet for that faked field goal to beat UF in '10 @the Swamp were the holder tossed the ball NO LOOK behind his head to have it bounce PERFECTLY to the kicker in full stride. Trying do that successful again 1 time out of 100. Tiny rant over :D)

OLS 12-06-2011 04:05 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 357 (Post 1494064)
Wait, if you're counting Saban wins don't forget you have to vacate a few for NCAA violations...

:tf

nah, we all make mistakes, lol. it would seem to me that it takes the same amount of coaching to win a
game you later vacate as it does to get a regular win.

OLS 12-06-2011 04:09 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 357 (Post 1494159)
More fun for you SEC fanboys...

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoot...-in-on-the-fun



I guess they really do believe that if you're not cheating your not trying.

Should I bring up the academic standards (or lack thereof)?

:tf

OK, hold it now...I think you are in the wrong thread. If you want to bash the SEC,
I invite you to go and do it in the SEC thread. Thanks. No offense, just not here, please.

OLS 12-06-2011 04:11 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Powers (Post 1494162)
(But I he's still the luckiest SOB on the planet for that faked field goal to beat UF in '10 @the Swamp were the holder tossed the ball NO LOOK behind his head to have it bounce PERFECTLY to the kicker in full stride. Trying do that successful again 1 time out of 100. Tiny rant over :D)

AH-hahahahahahah, you kill me, Michael. Tiny rant. Priceless. I thought I was seeing things.
That was actually the second time he tried that fake, the first time was FLAWLESS in every way.
Successful both times, btw.

E.J. 12-06-2011 05:13 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 357 (Post 1494159)
More fun for you SEC fanboys...

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoot...-in-on-the-fun



I guess they really do believe that if you're not cheating your not trying.

Should I bring up the academic standards (or lack thereof)?

:tf

Come on now....that's a low blow. They just really love their football down South, they're born into nurseries painted in school colors and are taught little sayings about their rivals as soon as they're old enough to talk.... They have 9 year old kids that know more about the game than people like myself. It is their culture....:r That piggy backs on the academic standards(focus is on SEC...SEC...SEC, not READING....WRITING.....ARITHMETIC....)

$EC....$EC....$EC

(All in good fun kids, if I seriously offend, it was not the intent)

longknocker 12-06-2011 05:16 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by E.J. (Post 1494307)
Come on now....that's a low blow. They just really love their football down South, they're born into nurseries painted in school colors and are taught little sayings about their rivals as soon as they're old enough to talk.... They have 9 year old kids that know more about the game than people like myself. It is their culture....:r That piggy backs on the academic standards(focus is on SEC...SEC...SEC, not READING....WRITING.....ARITHMETIC....)

$EC....$EC....$EC

(All in good fun kids, if I seriously offend, it was not the intent)

You're Just Jealous, Brother!:D :tu

E.J. 12-06-2011 05:25 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by longknocker (Post 1494308)
You're Just Jealous, Brother!:D :tu

I do enjoy the passion you guys have, in an admittedly odd sort of way. There is no way I'd be anywhere but the West....and no conference I'd rather be involved with, than the PAC12... As Jimmy Morrison said, "the West is the best." :tu

Wanger 12-07-2011 06:59 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
My head hurts!

Playoffs are needed, even before anyone got the shaft this year, plain and simple. The only way a national title becomes "real" this year is if LSU wins and OKST loses. If Bama wins, then the OKST supporters would be saying that they deserve a shot (and it's hard to argue that they don't, IMO). This is the ONLY sport that doesn't have a playoff system to determine the champion. How the hell does that work that this system is still around? I'm all for tradition, but come on...

rizzle 12-07-2011 08:26 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 357 (Post 1494159)
More fun for you SEC fanboys...

http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoot...-in-on-the-fun



I guess they really do believe that if you're not cheating your not trying.

Should I bring up the academic standards (or lack thereof)?

:tf

Quote:

Originally Posted by longknocker (Post 1494308)
You're Just Jealous, Brother!:D :tu

Greg, would it be too early to say that we may good at cheating, but at least we don't harbor, aid, and abet child molesters in our conference? :rolleyes: Yeah, probably too early. Strike that comment. My apologies. Carry on.... ;)

OLS 12-07-2011 12:08 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Powers (Post 1494162)

the holder tossed the ball NO LOOK behind his head to have it bounce PERFECTLY to the kicker in full stride. Trying do that successful again 1 time out of 100.

By the way, folks, that's exactly how we are going to beat Alabama next "year", with just
that kind of charmed occurrence. I know going in that bama fans thought this was the year, all
the planets and recruiting had aligned for this one moment in time. But it is actually LSU that is
going to have the meant to be season. LSU wins, bank it. Remember what happened LAST time
I gave out this advice?

OLS 12-07-2011 12:47 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Ehhh, I need to stop it. Like I said, I can't DO THIS for a freaking month, lol.

longknocker 12-07-2011 02:51 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLS (Post 1495067)
Ehhh, I need to stop it. Like I said, I can't DO THIS for a freaking month, lol.

You Always Have, In The Past, Brad! :r Like I Said Before, If You Win Jan. 9th, I'll Be Glad To Congratulate You!:tu We Shall See.;)

OLS 12-08-2011 11:28 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Even for me that is an INTOLERABLE amount of time to wait. The system has built-in calendar days BEGGING
for a playoff, and still we wait a month and basically lose all the football lovers except for the two individual
fanbases. Foul.

longknocker 12-08-2011 05:40 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLS (Post 1496116)
Even for me that is an INTOLERABLE amount of time to wait. The system has built-in calendar days BEGGING
for a playoff, and still we wait a month and basically lose all the football lovers except for the two individual
fanbases. Foul.

For All The "Big 12" Fans, I Heard Danny Sheridan On The Radio, Today. He Said No Way Can The Oklahoma States & Stanfords Compete With The LSU Or Alabama Defenses This Year. He Feels That Arkansas & Its Bobby Petrino Offense Is As Good As Any In The Big 12 & Both BAMA & LSU Demolished Arkansas This Year. A Great Defense Beats A Good Offense Every Time, My Friends!:tu :)

E.J. 01-02-2012 08:31 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
http://www.onionsportsnetwork.com/ar...ip-game,26851/

http://i1091.photobucket.com/albums/...ampionship.jpg

357 01-05-2012 06:48 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
I love it E.J.

I hope bama wins. Then who will be the champ? The both will have beat each other once and will have the same record.

chippewastud79 01-05-2012 08:13 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by 357 (Post 1521143)
I love it E.J.

I hope bama wins. Then who will be the champ? The both will have beat each other once and will have the same record.

OSU will also finish with the same record if Alabama wins. :sh

shilala 01-05-2012 08:14 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
It's easy to figure out. Who's got the best marketing advantage?
Go Money!!! :tu

hammondc 01-05-2012 08:19 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Well........yaaaawwwwnnnn.......I thoroughly enjoyed watching WVU ripping the "ACC Champions!!!!!!" apart last night. Clemson exposed AGAIN as the overrated team they are.

rizzle 01-05-2012 08:32 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Hey, you, with the chip on your shoulder about the Southeastern Conference.

Yeah, you, the one who can't wait to see the Allstate BCS National Championship Game because, for the first time in eight appearances, an SEC team will lose. With No. 1 LSU playing No. 2 Alabama in the Mercedes-Benz Superdome in New Orleans on Monday, there may be less relief there than you think.

You're frustrated with the system. You're mad that the power in college football has consolidated in one place and you're looking for someone or something to blame. The answer lies below.

But before you can look at the culprit, you're going to need a mirror.
Suck it

hammondc 01-05-2012 08:41 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rizzle (Post 1521233)


MMmmmmhmmm. Haters gonna hate....

357 01-05-2012 08:47 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by chippewastud79 (Post 1521216)
OSU will also finish with the same record if Alabama wins. :sh

Perfect. The more controversy and complaining from the schools, the more likely they replace this crap with a tourney.

357 01-05-2012 09:24 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by rizzle (Post 1521233)

Quote:

Even with the head start of Michigan, Ohio State and Penn State ranking 1-2-4 in attendance, the SEC led the nation in 2011, as it has every season since 1998. That's because SEC schools take six positions in the top 11. The revenues generated by that attendance put the SEC at the top of athletic spending, according to a survey by the Sports Business Journal. The median budget of SEC athletic departments in fiscal year 2012 is $90.3 million. The Big Ten is second at $78.8 million. No other conference has a median budget above $62 million.
So Michigan has a smaller budget due to lower attendance than an SEC school?

http://bentley.umich.edu/athdept/sta...xt/mattend.htm
Quote:

Michigan Stadium Attendance Records
The University of Michigan footbal team has played 230 consecutive games in front of crowds in excess of 100,000 through the 2010 season. The last time The Wolverines did not have 100,000 in attendance was Oct. 25, 1975 vs. Indiana when a crowd of 95,857 was on hand for the 55-7 Michigan victory.
Even a year old stat like that is staggering. The Big House is the largest college football stadium, and the third larest in the world, excluding NASCAR and horse racetracks. Don't give me the budget argument because it doesn't hold water. Michigan has soldout the largest stadium for 35 years, ranks 7th of all schools in merchandise sales and 4th overall in revenue/profit (with Georgia being the only SEC ahead of them).

The SEC wins because they are better at, or more willing, to cheat. The SEC signs more recruits than they are allowed to and are guilty of more NCAA violations than any other conference. Yet the NCAA is unwilling to really punish them because they bring in good TV ratings and hence lots of money.

7 of 12 SEC schools now facing sanctions in the past two years:
http://outkickthecoverage.com/south-...-sanctions.php

Merch numbers link:
per this link http://content.usatoday.com/communit...andise-sales/1)

Overall revenue/profit link:
http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/29/news...lars/index.htm

I'm not about bashing the SEC per se. Ohio State got a slap on the wrist too. The whole thing just bothers me. It's like Barry Bonds's homerun record. Sure he has the numbers, but everyone knows he cheated to get them.

Sure as a fan you get to enjoy the wins at gameday and the sanctions or vacated wins won't be official for a few years so, who cares?

I guess my beef is with the NCAA. If they want to get rid of this crap for real they'll punish all those who benefit from it. Players taking money/gifts, make them sit out 3 years before being eligible for the NFL draft. Take 20 scholarships for 3 years (60 total) from the school, and ban the coach for 3 years from taking ANY NCAA coaching position.

They'll never do it. They have no spine and they gave away their post season system to another entity (BCS), who crowns a mythical national champ every year.

OLS 01-06-2012 02:30 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Yes, but Mike, remember, when you are talking about NCAA violations, one of the teams
in the National Championship game has not had a major NCAA violation in 25 years. That's LSU,
baby, haha.

Someone here posted this link: http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoot...-in-on-the-fun
Which purports to show the SEC as this smudgy city on a hill of infractions, but all you have to do is read the part
they did not copy and past into the forum, the part that stops talking about the SEC and begins to shine the light
in all directions and how only a few schools in the entire system are clean. You are right, it is a barrel full of rotted
fruit and it needs to be upended and washed out with bleach. And as soon as you stop caring about intercollegiate
athletics, they will probably think about doing it. But for now the money is too powerful. Maybe we should
trade the BCS for our government, it might work better....oh wait, they are the same thing.

But we don't cheat better down here, we have more warm months to practice being great at football.
Or spicy food makes people run faster. But no, we don't cheat better, we all cheat the same. Yes, LSU
was busted for over-promising scholarships, but I am sure that is the same all over the country with the
schools where kids REALLY want to go, and it hurts the Vanderbilts and the Furmans and the whos-evers.
But it ain't a SEC deal, my friend. I wouldn't trust a single properly researched article that doesn't also point
out that these are just the flavor of the month mentions the SEC is getting...OH St. was properly noted by
you, Southern Cal, you can't swing a dead cat without hitting one. Corruption is not everywhere, but it sure
is widespread.

And as stated, NO major infractions for LSU since 1986...now this quote from the above article...Since 1987,
there have been 72 major infractions committed by 56 of the nation's current 120 FBS programs, including 44
of the current 67 automatic-qualifying BCS members -- a staggering 65.7 percent from the six power conferences.


Are there 56 SEC schools, haha.

.

357 01-09-2012 11:34 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
I'm no fan of government Brad. Point taken on LSU. They have been above reproach for some time. Helps to have a "Michigan Man" at the helm. ;)

OLS 01-09-2012 01:00 PM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
No, you were right for the most part....LSU got hit with trouble for over-promising scholarships,
and while it was not found to be a major infraction, it was very much in line whith what people call cheating.
But yeah, haha, we're clean as a baby's butt, and twice as smoove.

OLS 01-10-2012 06:06 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
THE BCS IS BROKEN, We should have played Oklahoma State, lol........

ninjavanish 01-10-2012 06:13 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
So you're saying that the bcs is broken... Because clearly the #2 lsu tigers should have played the #3 osu cowboys?

Or

I dunno. Maybe you're right, maybe the bcs is broken... Maybe Stanford deserved to play instead of lsu. Or maybe Boise.

OLS 01-10-2012 07:26 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
It was supposed to be a thread closing joke, Jerms.....

Since you are from Alabama, let me explain it.
After the whipping we took at the hands of Alabama, I am now saying we should have played OK St.


Get it?? :r

Oh and not for nuttin, but I DOUBT we will be #2 in the end. I would bet on and support a OK St. #2
If we had even scored a point of any KIND, hell GA Southern hung a couple TDs on the Tide.
After all, if you don't WIN IT ALL, who really cares where you shake out?

ninjavanish 01-10-2012 08:10 AM

Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by OLS (Post 1526196)
It was supposed to be a thread closing joke, Jerms.....

Since you are from Alabama, let me explain it.
After the whipping we took at the hands of Alabama, I am now saying we should have played OK St.


Get it?? :r

Oh and not for nuttin, but I DOUBT we will be #2 in the end. I would bet on and support a OK St. #2
If we had even scored a point of any KIND, hell GA Southern hung a couple TDs on the Tide.
After all, if you don't WIN IT ALL, who really cares where you shake out?

Hehe, ok I'll let it rest. :) had to get one jab In there.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.