![]() |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
^^^...and the loser of that BIG10 Championship game....what BCS game are they going to?
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
make a field goal to win a game, and not have your misses be just blind bad luck, but consistent failure, there is no way bama is better. Saban is not the only person in the football world who knew going in it was likely he was going to have to make a lot of field goals. LSU is not sisters of the poor. And yet he consistently forced his kicker to take these wildly out-of-range shots at the uprights. So maybe we even have a better COACH than you guys. You guys had THE Trent Richardson, you should have GONE FOR IT on 4th down. -(P you are deluded, hoss, lol. |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
I Think Most People Think Saban Has Been A Better Coach Than Miles Over Their Lifetimes, Brad.:) I Will Admit You Have Better Special Teams, But I Feel We Have A Better Offense & Defense. We'll See How It Plays Out Jan.9th In The "Neutral" (What A Joke! :r) Site Of New Orleans!:tu
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
A.) We can't control the venue for the NCG. We have coincidentally been crowned champ in every year we played in the dome for all the marbles. That is true. B.) You ain't Boise St.....you are only driving to New Orleans. You will have access to as many tickets as we do. I don't need to remind you the argument I got into over the pitiful tickets we got for the Bama-LSU matchup in T-town. I was schooled on that one, though. C.) New Orleans is not Baton Rouge by a long shot, in any way, except the state it's in and the fact that there are some cajuns there. There are cajuns in Tuscaloosa. 90-minutes for us, about double that for you. haha, OK, got that out of my system. On to Saban - Miles. I think without researching that Miles has a much better winning percentage over his tenure at LSU than Nickie did, and I think it is also better than Nickie's at Bama. THINK. But what an excellent point....RESEARCH, here I go, lol. |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
Who cares for $100, Alex? :r:r |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
Go For It!:r Look At Coaching Records Over Their Entire Careers, Brad!:tu |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
The system is flawed, but they made the right move last time by tweaking the rankings to avoid a rematch. This year their SEC bias is preventing them from doing what is right. |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
"Miles goes into the 2011 season with a record at LSU of 62-17, including a 33-15 mark in SEC regular season games.
Miles is the fastest coach in LSU history to reach milestone victories of 10, 20, 30, 40, 50 and 60 games. " That quote alone precludes Saban from having been that record-holder, so even though I think it is currently a small diffrential, I believe that Miles is better all around in LSU records and likely had a better record than Saban for what, "first 4 years at the school" type records. Of course, Saban got to bama in somewhat of a disarray and Saban left miles a full cupboard. That affected their first year's totals a good bit. But the statement Les can only win with Saban's recruits has been roundly proven illegitimate as you can very well see. He is about to win his second Nat. Champ. if you don't mind me saying so. But I have to state for the record in this thread what I have ALWAYS said, I am not someone who blames Saban for leaving. his average "years at school" is a measly 2.5 over his career. There were some doofus fans that had to throw up a sign that denigrated him on his return to BR some years back, but Miles is and has been a fan favorite that never gives us any reason to look back at Saban and think, "if only we had nick saban..." |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
One at a time, lol. YES we anxiously await you guys at the Dome. No doubt gonna be must-see TV for at least
two fan bases.... TWO, what across all TWO teams of his career?? 90-38. Not as good as Saban, but only time will tell. He has Saban beat %-wise so far over Saban at LSU and certainly at Bama. Where can he go from here? See?? again with the waiting. i can't believe I have ALL through SHOPPING season, Christmas, NEW YEARS and being too fat from all of it before I even see a PROMO for this game. RE-tarded. |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Wait, if you're counting Saban wins don't forget you have to vacate a few for NCAA violations...
:tf |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
Haha, get over it, If I polled 100% of likely Bama bowl attendees, 95% of them would rather ride to New Orleans to see the game than any venue in the state of Alabama...come on, it's NEW ORLEANS! My God, can you IMAGINE what that joint is gonna be like. VERY neutral site. Sure, if we were playing Wisconsin, it might be a little slanted towards Purple and gold in the seats, but you guys are gonna travel well. I hope they restrict it to sides so there is a stark LINE of red and purple. ANd I hope even more that they slant the split to give eatch team an entire endzone, or even half it perpendicular to the field. |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
Quote:
You know, I laugh at him all the time, but he's obviously a good coach. The SEC is better for having him. Just another character to add to the mix. He's like the crazy uncle at Thanksgiving dinner. |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
More fun for you SEC fanboys...
http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoot...-in-on-the-fun Quote:
Should I bring up the academic standards (or lack thereof)? :tf |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
While I now acknowledge him as an elite coach, I still like to sometimes laugh kindheartedly at his quirks and eccentricities. 'Course I think that's one of my favorite things about meeting and getting to know new people, quirky character traits are what make life fun :tu (But I he's still the luckiest SOB on the planet for that faked field goal to beat UF in '10 @the Swamp were the holder tossed the ball NO LOOK behind his head to have it bounce PERFECTLY to the kicker in full stride. Trying do that successful again 1 time out of 100. Tiny rant over :D) |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
game you later vacate as it does to get a regular win. |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
I invite you to go and do it in the SEC thread. Thanks. No offense, just not here, please. |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
That was actually the second time he tried that fake, the first time was FLAWLESS in every way. Successful both times, btw. |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
$EC....$EC....$EC (All in good fun kids, if I seriously offend, it was not the intent) |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
My head hurts!
Playoffs are needed, even before anyone got the shaft this year, plain and simple. The only way a national title becomes "real" this year is if LSU wins and OKST loses. If Bama wins, then the OKST supporters would be saying that they deserve a shot (and it's hard to argue that they don't, IMO). This is the ONLY sport that doesn't have a playoff system to determine the champion. How the hell does that work that this system is still around? I'm all for tradition, but come on... |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
that kind of charmed occurrence. I know going in that bama fans thought this was the year, all the planets and recruiting had aligned for this one moment in time. But it is actually LSU that is going to have the meant to be season. LSU wins, bank it. Remember what happened LAST time I gave out this advice? |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Ehhh, I need to stop it. Like I said, I can't DO THIS for a freaking month, lol.
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Even for me that is an INTOLERABLE amount of time to wait. The system has built-in calendar days BEGGING
for a playoff, and still we wait a month and basically lose all the football lovers except for the two individual fanbases. Foul. |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
I love it E.J.
I hope bama wins. Then who will be the champ? The both will have beat each other once and will have the same record. |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
It's easy to figure out. Who's got the best marketing advantage?
Go Money!!! :tu |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Well........yaaaawwwwnnnn.......I thoroughly enjoyed watching WVU ripping the "ACC Champions!!!!!!" apart last night. Clemson exposed AGAIN as the overrated team they are.
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
Quote:
http://bentley.umich.edu/athdept/sta...xt/mattend.htm Quote:
The SEC wins because they are better at, or more willing, to cheat. The SEC signs more recruits than they are allowed to and are guilty of more NCAA violations than any other conference. Yet the NCAA is unwilling to really punish them because they bring in good TV ratings and hence lots of money. 7 of 12 SEC schools now facing sanctions in the past two years: http://outkickthecoverage.com/south-...-sanctions.php Merch numbers link: per this link http://content.usatoday.com/communit...andise-sales/1) Overall revenue/profit link: http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/29/news...lars/index.htm I'm not about bashing the SEC per se. Ohio State got a slap on the wrist too. The whole thing just bothers me. It's like Barry Bonds's homerun record. Sure he has the numbers, but everyone knows he cheated to get them. Sure as a fan you get to enjoy the wins at gameday and the sanctions or vacated wins won't be official for a few years so, who cares? I guess my beef is with the NCAA. If they want to get rid of this crap for real they'll punish all those who benefit from it. Players taking money/gifts, make them sit out 3 years before being eligible for the NFL draft. Take 20 scholarships for 3 years (60 total) from the school, and ban the coach for 3 years from taking ANY NCAA coaching position. They'll never do it. They have no spine and they gave away their post season system to another entity (BCS), who crowns a mythical national champ every year. |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Yes, but Mike, remember, when you are talking about NCAA violations, one of the teams
in the National Championship game has not had a major NCAA violation in 25 years. That's LSU, baby, haha. Someone here posted this link: http://www.cbssports.com/collegefoot...-in-on-the-fun Which purports to show the SEC as this smudgy city on a hill of infractions, but all you have to do is read the part they did not copy and past into the forum, the part that stops talking about the SEC and begins to shine the light in all directions and how only a few schools in the entire system are clean. You are right, it is a barrel full of rotted fruit and it needs to be upended and washed out with bleach. And as soon as you stop caring about intercollegiate athletics, they will probably think about doing it. But for now the money is too powerful. Maybe we should trade the BCS for our government, it might work better....oh wait, they are the same thing. But we don't cheat better down here, we have more warm months to practice being great at football. Or spicy food makes people run faster. But no, we don't cheat better, we all cheat the same. Yes, LSU was busted for over-promising scholarships, but I am sure that is the same all over the country with the schools where kids REALLY want to go, and it hurts the Vanderbilts and the Furmans and the whos-evers. But it ain't a SEC deal, my friend. I wouldn't trust a single properly researched article that doesn't also point out that these are just the flavor of the month mentions the SEC is getting...OH St. was properly noted by you, Southern Cal, you can't swing a dead cat without hitting one. Corruption is not everywhere, but it sure is widespread. And as stated, NO major infractions for LSU since 1986...now this quote from the above article...Since 1987, there have been 72 major infractions committed by 56 of the nation's current 120 FBS programs, including 44 of the current 67 automatic-qualifying BCS members -- a staggering 65.7 percent from the six power conferences. Are there 56 SEC schools, haha. . |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
I'm no fan of government Brad. Point taken on LSU. They have been above reproach for some time. Helps to have a "Michigan Man" at the helm. ;)
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
No, you were right for the most part....LSU got hit with trouble for over-promising scholarships,
and while it was not found to be a major infraction, it was very much in line whith what people call cheating. But yeah, haha, we're clean as a baby's butt, and twice as smoove. |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
THE BCS IS BROKEN, We should have played Oklahoma State, lol........
|
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
So you're saying that the bcs is broken... Because clearly the #2 lsu tigers should have played the #3 osu cowboys?
Or I dunno. Maybe you're right, maybe the bcs is broken... Maybe Stanford deserved to play instead of lsu. Or maybe Boise. |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
It was supposed to be a thread closing joke, Jerms.....
Since you are from Alabama, let me explain it. After the whipping we took at the hands of Alabama, I am now saying we should have played OK St. Get it?? :r Oh and not for nuttin, but I DOUBT we will be #2 in the end. I would bet on and support a OK St. #2 If we had even scored a point of any KIND, hell GA Southern hung a couple TDs on the Tide. After all, if you don't WIN IT ALL, who really cares where you shake out? |
Re: Bcs - wtf 2011
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:39 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.