![]() |
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
Quote:
Your point of view (opinion) was presented in the first post here. The fact that others don't agree or question the credibility of your assertions has little to do with "seeing another point of view". It's a matter of the assertions lack of traction based upon facts in evidence and our personal experiences. Not an opposing point of view, but the lack of credibility of yours. No one is asserting that internet cigars are better than B&M's. Not agreeing with you is not the same as not being able to see your point of view. What cigars have you found to be better at the B&M than from the internet? How long did you own them before smoking them and making these judgments? And, did you buy singles on the internet or boxes of them? |
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
Quote:
|
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
Quote:
What I'm looking for is a series of statements backing up your thesis. Data would be helpful. For example, you suggest a number of times that B&Ms would be better markets for a cigar manufacturer. How so? How many boxes would your B&M buy of a specific cigar .. lets say Rocky Patel Decade torpedo as an example ... compared to CI? Neither you nor I know the prices that Rocky charges CI or B&Ms, but volume discounts are typical in many industries and they are rarely hidden. Why is the B&M a better customer? One would kind of think CI would sell a few more decades than your B&M, no? Wouldn't the manufacturer think their best customer is the one pushing the most boxes .. not necessarily the one with the cushy leather seats and flat screens? That is a question, answer at leisure. Remember, if Patel makes 40 bucks a box on 25 boxes your B&M buys, they make 1000 bucks. If they make 5 bucks a box on 3000 boxes CI buys, they make 15 grand. Sales volume often drives profit. Yet, your thesis is that better quality RP Decade torps are going to the B&M because they are better customers. Maybe the total cigar volume sales are wildly in the B&M favor because there are so many of them. Dunno. You have any numbers on sales volumes for big internet retailers v.s combined B&Ms? |
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
The fact is that neither side is provable and I never looked for agreement. Only discussion. I acknowledged the possibility of my opinion being wrong and some of the merits of the other side. Others here gave their opinion and said the other side was impossible. And mocked. The fact remains its unprovable. You don't have to agree but its just arrogantly stupid to require proof or convincing to, at a minimum, acknowledge the possibility.
|
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
I know a guy that has a humidor he bought from a lounge.
BTW, it has a few really nice cigars in it. I don't think he got them from the local B&M but I might be wrong. |
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
Quote:
|
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
Quote:
Come here you height challenged bundle of love so I can give ya a http://img118.exs.cx/img118/1691/hug8ok.gif So he does get them from a B&M? :hm |
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
Quote:
|
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
These posts are always ammusing to read. No one ever takes opposing opinions very well.
|
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
Quote:
:r:r |
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
I don't know specifically why the B&M customer is worthy or considered more valuable, but nick perdomo. Rocky patel. La aurora and don pepin are hosting guys from our lounge at a considerable loss within the last year. Have all visited our lounge at least once in the last year. Eddie Ortega when I spoke with him said "I don't want to just sell to CI, Thompson and famous.". I don't have the numbers, but it would seem that these guys consider the local shops very valuable.
I believe that is a lucid conclusion. Please correct my dimentia if I'm wrong. |
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
That may be a lucid conclusion, but you may also have lucid dreams:r
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6lBx...eature=related I have a feeling this thread will reach 1000 posts easily:r |
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
Quote:
Oh, sure, Sean, use logic. Real nice. Quote:
|
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
|
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
Quote:
But I was thinking "more valuable" in the sense of where do the profits originate from ... B&Ms or big internet shops. I'm personally inclined to think the profit split is not vastly unbalanced, if we combine all B&M sales v.s. all internet sales. This would suggest that manufacturers pay attention to and care about both models of sales. Which would argue against one getting better quality than the other. Another thing that I was thinking about today is that often the first release of a cigar is superior to subsequent releases. Lets look at an example: La Aurora cien anos. I was not as excited about the last box I had (smoked ROTT) compared to ones I had when they were first released (smoked ROTT). My B&M has one of the first release boxes hidden away (you need to do some serious rooting or ask for them to find them). I bought one of those and liked it better than my recent box purchase. Was this due to some quality stratification at the manufacturer - B&M v.s. internet, as you suggest? Was it due to age? Was it because those B&M cigars were the first release? In the latter case, it is likely that the first release cigars are available longer at B&Ms than online - make sense? Only the shadow knows. |
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
Quote:
|
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
Quote:
|
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
I just had a good B&M. Self stirring when complete. :tu
|
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
Quote:
|
Re: stirring the pot local B&M vs big internet
Quote:
Beer, corned beef and cabbage. mmmmmmmmm :pn |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:01 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.