Cigar Asylum Cigar Forum

Cigar Asylum Cigar Forum (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/index.php)
-   All Cigar Discussion (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=5)
-   -   Is it odd? (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/showthread.php?t=31356)

NCRadioMan 04-26-2010 11:46 AM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by wayner123 (Post 840248)
Have you tried bumping your cigars up to say 70% for a few months and see if you like them? Or have less plug issues? It might be a worthwhile experiment.

I, like Tom, keep mine in the low 60's. A few years ago, I did keep a humidor close to 70 just to compare. I have never had many plug problems to begin with but I did experience tighter draws, burn issues, harshness and muted flavors when smoking from the 70% humidor. Needless to say, I didn't keep that humidor at 70.

I have also had luck with a few plugged cigars by just putting them back after cutting and testing the draw. I also don't know how or why but in my experience, it worked.

icehog3 04-26-2010 11:46 AM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by wayner123 (Post 840248)
The latter.

In that thread we looked at wetting cigars and how much of the water reached the filler due to absorbtion. The conclusion was it didn't reach the filler at all, or was so small it couldn't be quantified. So based on that info, you "could" say that the filler of a cigar is not at 62%, but through experience you have come to like the way your cigars smoke at 62%. Have you tried bumping your cigars up to say 70% for a few months and see if you like them? Or have less plug issues? It might be a worthwhile experiment.

My preference for 62% came from a couple years of experimentation, starting with the 70% and gradually working my way down in humidity. I went through long periods at 70%, 67&, 65%, so I can say my preference for 62% is definitely experience-based, and I much prefer the way my cigars taste and burn at 62% over 70%..

I still am not convinced that wetting the wrapper and not having the mositure reach the filler is equivalent with an RH level affecting the filler during long term storage, but this is strictly my thoughts and I don't have any science to base it on....making the thought worthless to anyone but me. :)

Mark 04-26-2010 11:48 AM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by wayner123 (Post 840248)
In that thread we looked at wetting cigars and how much of the water reached the filler due to absorbtion. The conclusion was it didn't reach the filler at all, or was so small it couldn't be quantified. So based on that info, you "could" say that the filler of a cigar is not at 62%, but through experience you have come to like the way your cigars smoke at 62%.

I think there is a logical fallacy in this, Wayner. Granted the water didn't get to the filler within the span of a few minutes or hours, but I am SURE if you wet the cigar and let it sit for months, the extra humidity would permeate the cigar. When you have a gas-permeable solid (tobacco, in this case) and you put it in a humidified environment for a sufficient amount of time, the solid will reach equilibrium with the environment (in this case it will be evenly humidified). If you put a cigar in a 70% humi for a day, yes the filler will still be lower than the wrapper and binder, but leave it for a number of weeks or months and equilibrium will, necessarily, be reached. Thats just the nature of gases and permeable membranes.

All that to say, if Tom's cigars are in the cab/vino/humidor long enough the entire cigar will, eventually, reach equlibrium. The binder and wrapper will humidify faster, but it is not possible that it will forever "insulate" the filler.

Cut the caps or not, after long enough time in the humi (I would say a month or so, although a couple of weeks is probably sufficient) the cigar will always be evenly humidified.

(:2 from a bible scholar. Take everything with a grain of salt, but know that that grain of salt may be your eternal damnation :r)

icehog3 04-26-2010 11:55 AM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Thanks for putting it more succinctly than I did, Mark.

wayner123 04-26-2010 12:00 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by icehog3 (Post 840267)
My preference for 62% came from a couple years of experimentation, starting with the 70% and gradually working my way down in humidity. I went through long periods at 70%, 67&, 65%, so I can say my preference for 62% is definitely experience-based, and I much prefer the way my cigars taste and burn at 62% over 70%..

I still am not convinced that wetting the wrapper and not having the mositure reach the filler is equivalent with an RH level affecting the filler during long term storage, but this is strictly my thoughts and I don't have any science to base it on....making the thought worthless to anyone but me. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark (Post 840269)
I think there is a logical fallacy in this, Wayner. Granted the water didn't get to the filler within the span of a few minutes or hours, but I am SURE if you wet the cigar and let it sit for months, the extra humidity would permeate the cigar. When you have a gas-permeable solid (tobacco, in this case) and you put it in a humidified environment for a sufficient amount of time, the solid will reach equilibrium with the environment (in this case it will be evenly humidified). If you put a cigar in a 70% humi for a day, yes the filler will still be lower than the wrapper and binder, but leave it for a number of weeks or months and equilibrium will, necessarily, be reached. Thats just the nature of gases and permeable membranes.

All that to say, if Tom's cigars are in the cab/vino/humidor long enough the entire cigar will, eventually, reach equlibrium. The binder and wrapper will humidify faster, but it is not possible that it will forever "insulate" the filler.

Cut the caps or not, after long enough time in the humi (I would say a month or so, although a couple of weeks is probably sufficient) the cigar will always be evenly humidified.

(:2 from a bible scholar. Take everything with a grain of salt, but know that that grain of salt may be your eternal damnation :r)


Both very valid points. My explanation was merely a guess and based mainly on my own experiences and advice written by MRN and others.

icehog3 04-26-2010 12:02 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by wayner123 (Post 840284)
Both very valid points. My explanation was merely a guess and based mainly on my own experiences and advice written by MRN and others.

I guess experimentation and finding out what works best for us each individually is the safest bet. :)

wayner123 04-26-2010 12:05 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by icehog3 (Post 840289)
I guess experimentation and finding out what works best for us each individually is the safest bet. :)

That's signature worthy.

And that is probably the best answer to the OP's question. Try it out and see if it works for you.

md4958 04-26-2010 12:22 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by wayner123 (Post 840233)
Because more of the cigar is affected by the RH. The cap, while not airtight, does provide some insulation to the cigar's filler. So by allowing more humidity into the cigar it swells and thus "unplugs" the cigar.

*disclaimer - I am not saying this is fact or some magical effect. I am just stating what happens and what the outcome might be.

So if I understand your theory correctly, the swelling will help with a tight draw???

:hm

This kinda contradicts the common practice of letting wet cigars dry out to improve the draw.

Im no scientist, but the latter makes more sense to me.

wayner123 04-26-2010 12:30 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by md4958 (Post 840311)
So if I understand your theory correctly, the swelling will help with a tight draw???

:hm

This kinda contradicts the common practice of letting wet cigars dry out to improve the draw.

Im no scientist, but the latter makes more sense to me.

And exactly why the discussion and question was posed. icehog3 and Bao have used a non dry box method and it worked for them.

md4958 04-26-2010 12:39 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by wayner123 (Post 840327)
And exactly why the discussion and question was posed. icehog3 and Bao have used a non dry box method and it worked for them.

Tom and Bao didnt ADD humidity to their cigars...the cigars went right back into the ambient RH that they had previously resided in. The only difference being the cap had already been cut.

Unless Tom and Bao, I read your posts incorrectly??

itzfrank 04-26-2010 12:40 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by md4958 (Post 840311)
So if I understand your theory correctly, the swelling will help with a tight draw???

:hm

This kinda contradicts the common practice of letting wet cigars dry out to improve the draw.

Im no scientist, but the latter makes more sense to me.


When you say wet, do you mean wet or just kept in high humidity. Because , if it were actually wet, the draw would be restricted because of the actual filler sticking together. No?

md4958 04-26-2010 12:46 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by itzfrank (Post 840334)
When you say wet, do you mean wet or just kept in high humidity. Because , if it were actually wet, the draw would be restricted because of the actual filler sticking together. No?

Wet meaning the tobacco is retaining a good amount of moisture. Tobacco leaves are moistened prior to being rolled into cigars. The tobacco, being hygroscopic, will "hold on" to this moisture. Many times this results in a poor smoke. "Drying" these cigars consists of gradually reducing the humidity via rest in your humidor. The moisture in your cigar will reach an equilibrium with your humidors RH%. Could take a week, could take a couple months.

I had a box of Punch Double Coronas that were unsmokeable for 6 months.

wayner123 04-26-2010 01:02 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by md4958 (Post 840333)
Tom and Bao didnt ADD humidity to their cigars...the cigars went right back into the ambient RH that they had previously resided in. The only difference being the cap had already been cut.

Unless Tom and Bao, I read your posts incorrectly??

That's why I asked "why" that might happen. If it's going into the same RH, then what's happening? :confused:

In the last reply I merely said they used a non-drybox method.

itzfrank 04-26-2010 01:11 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by md4958 (Post 840344)
Wet meaning the tobacco is retaining a good amount of moisture. Tobacco leaves are moistened prior to being rolled into cigars. The tobacco, being hygroscopic, will "hold on" to this moisture. Many times this results in a poor smoke. "Drying" these cigars consists of gradually reducing the humidity via rest in your humidor. The moisture in your cigar will reach an equilibrium with your humidors RH%. Could take a week, could take a couple months.

I had a box of Punch Double Coronas that were unsmokeable for 6 months.

Thanks for the clarification.

Mark 04-26-2010 02:32 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Boy, these pretzels are really makin' me thirsty.

jmsremax 04-26-2010 02:49 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mugen910 (Post 838367)
1). Would it be odd if I showed up to herfs with my cigars precut? Even if I don't smoke them all? That also brings up another question about storage.

2). Does it effect the cigar in any way to have been cut and then rested for months, maybe even years? I am still new to this cigar stuff so I was just curious.

TIA
Posted via Mobile Device

Is the wedding that boring Bao?

SmokinApe 04-26-2010 06:29 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Bao, I would look at you with disgust if you pulled a stunt like that... I would wonder "wtf? This guy cany cut his cigars at the herf like the rest of us?" I would then start a petition to have you banned...

Mugen910 04-29-2010 12:10 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokinApe (Post 840731)
Bao, I would look at you with disgust if you pulled a stunt like that... I would wonder "wtf? This guy cany cut his cigars at the herf like the rest of us?" I would then start a petition to have you banned...

;s

Brutus2600 04-29-2010 02:43 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Mark (Post 838598)
I learned from James Suckling and my friends at that most illustrious magazine that you shouldn't cut the cigar until after you have lit it, because this way you look like more of an @sshole.


Funny + informational thread. The above quote made me lol at work :r

klipsch 04-29-2010 03:43 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Are these still available?

icehog3 04-29-2010 03:50 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by klipsch (Post 844688)
Are these still available?

What, pre-cut cigars?

GKitty 04-29-2010 04:46 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Nooooooo... Cigar-pixies.

KiKi 05-02-2010 02:58 AM

Re: Is it odd?
 
There is a ritual just before lighting the cigar. Part of the ritual is cutting the cigar. It's like a ceremony.....don't mess with it.....spoils the fun :) (That being said, you can put them threw your paper shredder if you choose....you own 'em :) )

OLS 05-05-2010 02:18 PM

Re: Is it odd?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by awsmith4 (Post 838375)
I would find that the least odd thing about you :D

Hehehehehe...ehh


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:34 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.