![]() |
Re: Farve vs. Packers
Quote:
|
Re: Farve vs. Packers
I thought it was crap how Farve was booed when he took the field.
|
Re: Farve vs. Packers
I love Favre and even though the Vikings are winning, I cannot stand the plays the coach is calling. What an Asshole!!!
|
Re: Farve vs. Packers
A$$ Whooping!!!! :tu
|
Re: Farve vs. Packers
The Vikings were strong, and deserved to win today even though their 3rd quarter was pretty weak. However, I continue to be impressed with Aaron Rodgers, and think he has the ability to be a great quarterback.
Quote:
|
Re: Farve vs. Packers
Turned out to be a good game!!
|
Re: Farve vs. Packers
I thought it was really classless of the Packer fans that booed. You could tell it hurt Favre to hear that from the fans, the same fans that cheered him for 16 years. When they panned to the crowd there was a lot of support for Brett too, but the booing was just crazy to me.
That being said, I couldn't be happier that Brett stuck it to Mccarthy and Thompson twice this year. 7 TDs, 0 Interceptions, and not a single sack..... I wonder if Thompson is second guessing himself after tonight. And I think it is even worse of the CEO to act all innocent. I guess he wasn't at the game because he couldn't "bare to see Favre in a different colored Jersey"..... well I think he has the power to fire Thompson, so he could have made his feelings about keeping Brett around known |
Re: Farve vs. Packers
Quote:
I won't bash Favre. I think both sides were handled the whole situation wrongly. However, if Brett were on the Green Bay side of the ball tonight, I'm not sure he'd be standing. I also think that the dark side that is Brett Favre would have reared the ugly interception head. It was a fun game to be at. The Packers lost - Bret didn't beat them. You can blame part of that on coaching and play-calling. If you watched the game, you know what I mean. |
Re: Farve vs. Packers
Quote:
|
Re: Farve vs. Packers
Well, GB did get hurt by a couple of key penalties, but they also got a huge break on their first drive when Minnesota's challenge on the fumble was rejected. And not that it would've changed the outcome, but when Berrian scored the last TD, it should have been a 15 yd facemask penalty. The DB grabbed both sides of his facemask to tackle him.
Much as I hate the Pack, I have to agree with the Rev that Rodgers has been very professional through the whole Favre mess. And if he had an O-line, it would've been a different game. Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: Farve vs. Packers
Best T-Shirt shot at the game:
"We Will Never Forget You Brent!". :r :r |
Re: Farve vs. Packers
Quote:
;) :D |
Re: Farve vs. Packers
Quote:
|
Re: Farve vs. Packers
Quote:
DId Brett play well? Yes, no doubt about it. But the Packer defense did not perform. Had they sacked him once or twice and this would have been a different game. Had the coverage been better, this was a different game. If the Packer offense played as well in the first half as they did in the second half, this would have been a different game. My point? While one man can make a difference in a football game, it is still a team effort. Put Brett in Packer jersey last night and the outcome would have been the same - A Viking victory. At the same time, put Rodgers in a Viking jersey - it it would have maybe been even worse for the Pack. With Brett as a Packer last night, he'd have been a hurting pup. |
Re: Farve vs. Packers
Quote:
Brett has an excellent sense of pocket pressure, and even at 40 yrs old has a good ability to move around in the pocket. If Rodgers was the QB for the Vikings, he would have been sacked probably 2-3 times last night when Favre was not. On the other hand, although the Packers o-line is not the greatest this year.... of all the sacks last night at least 3 were Rodgers fault for not getting rid of the ball. Of the 14 sacks given up to the Vikings, I would say 8 at least are Rodgers own fault... he needs to learn how to get rid of the ball and/or step up in the pocket. And as far as winning the game, both games this year the packers have contained adrian peterson very well. Last year, if that would have happened the vikings wouldn't have a had a chance. This year w/ Brett @ QB, they can win games when adrian peterson isn't having as good of a night. Yes it is a team effort, but I'm fairly comfortable in saying that the Vikings would not have beaten the Pack this year if Favre wasn't at QB. And the coverage was actually pretty good last night. But Favre knows those guys and how they cover, and the man can just make throws and see things that other people can not.... slipping the ball in between 2 defenders and throwing when his feet are not set. |
Re: Farve vs. Packers
True, Peterson didn't have the huge yards he racked up against the Pack last season. But, just under 100 yds rushing, 40+ receiving, and a TD isn't exactly a sub-par performance. I think he could've gone higher, but with Rice and Harvin catching everything in the same zip code, grinding the run wasn't a necessity.
Posted via Mobile Device |
Re: Farve vs. Packers
Quote:
|
Re: Farve vs. Packers
Quote:
In the first game last year he had 103 rushing yds, 34 of which came on one big run. In the second game he had alot of yards, but got his TD on a long run, and helped setup a short TD pass. The guy is the best running back in the league, and the Packers for whatever reason have consistently contained him better than many other teams is all I'm saying, so by no means take it as an insult against AP |
Re: Farve vs. Packers
Quote:
The statement from me that you high-lited was in reference to the game in MN, not this past week-end. Also I never said that Rogers said anything about Brett. Based on comments he made earlier in the year about his ability to play, I stated that in time he would be one of the greats, and that his problem now is that he believes he already is! I watched the game closely and know exactly what you mean. Personally, I believe no matter who was the quarterback for GB this passed weekend, they would have lost! GB management is so F--- U- over their quarterback situation and the Brett Favre issue, that they have forgotten about the rest of the players & positions! As far as bad calls, I am referring mostly to MN. The coach had his head up his Ass. If he would have started to pass 2/3 of the time, instead of running up the center somewhere between the tackles 2/3 of the time, MN would have easily had 2 or 3 more TDs! |
Re: Farve vs. Packers
Quote:
|
Re: Farve vs. Packers
|
Re: Farve vs. Packers
Quote:
I have heard his confidence come around, and it better have, for if you go out there thinking you're no good - then you don't belong on the field. |
Re: Farve vs. Packers
Can you imagine all the brouhaha when Rodgers is MNs backup QB next year?
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:25 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.