Cigar Asylum Cigar Forum

Cigar Asylum Cigar Forum (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/index.php)
-   Sports (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/forumdisplay.php?f=57)
-   -   *2009 MLB Thread* (http://www.cigarasylum.com/vb/showthread.php?t=13447)

Powers 09-29-2009 10:55 AM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
LETS GO BRAVES!

only two games back :wo

MedicCook 09-30-2009 10:07 AM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
The Indians fired Eric Wedge as manager today.

kelmac07 09-30-2009 10:55 AM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MedicCook (Post 574967)
The Indians fired Eric Wedge as manager today.

Knew this one was coming. Anyone think the Twins can overtake the Tigers?

VirtualSmitty 09-30-2009 12:38 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kelmac07 (Post 575070)
Knew this one was coming. Anyone think the Twins can overtake the Tigers?

It's possible. Pavano is going tonight and he just owns Detroit. That would put them only a game back. So anything could happen really.

MedicCook 09-30-2009 01:28 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by VirtualSmitty (Post 575286)
It's possible. Pavano is going tonight and he just owns Detroit. That would put them only a game back. So anything could happen really.

When is Pavano going to hurt himself?

TBone 09-30-2009 01:32 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
I'm with Moe this is where it's at RED SOX

VirtualSmitty 09-30-2009 01:36 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MedicCook (Post 575374)
When is Pavano going to hurt himself?

Figured it would have already happened by now. Guess it only happens when he's collecting a big check :td

VirtualSmitty 09-30-2009 05:54 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
The mighty Nats just beat the Mets again in wild fashion :r

SmokinDuck 10-03-2009 02:05 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
It doesn't get any better than this.

Go Twins!!

VirtualSmitty 10-04-2009 05:22 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Tigers win, Twins win, we gonna have us a tiebreaker!

yachties23 10-04-2009 06:19 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by VirtualSmitty (Post 582688)
Tigers win, Twins win, we gonna have us a tiebreaker!

works out well for you. When are we doing a playoff game herf at JRs?

kelmac07 10-05-2009 03:06 AM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Game #163...I'm loving this (since my Mets have been out of the hunt since June).

MedicCook 10-05-2009 09:52 AM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Because of MNF the game can not be played tonight since the Twins are the home team for the game. Tuesday at 5pm they will play the tie-breaker.

shilala 10-05-2009 12:51 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Arod. 2 HR/7RBI/2R in one inning.
Unreal.

The Poet 10-05-2009 01:12 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shilala (Post 584130)
Arod. 2 HR/7RBI/2R in one inning.
Unreal.

Know what else, Scott? When A-Rod came back this year after his surgery, he hit the very first pitch he saw for a HR - yesterday he hit the very last pitch he saw for a grand slam.

kelmac07 10-05-2009 01:19 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poet (Post 584175)
Know what else, Scott? When A-Rod came back this year after his surgery, he hit the very first pitch he saw for a HR - yesterday he hit the very last pitch he saw for a grand slam.

And he will STILL choke in October!! What's he hitting...something like .189 in the playoffs??? :tu

The Poet 10-05-2009 01:24 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kelmac07 (Post 584186)
And he will STILL choke in October!! What's he hitting...something like .189 in the playoffs??? :tu

Well, it beats choking in September - or even June, you Met fan. :D

shilala 10-05-2009 01:48 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poet (Post 584175)
Know what else, Scott? When A-Rod came back this year after his surgery, he hit the very first pitch he saw for a HR - yesterday he hit the very last pitch he saw for a grand slam.

After missing the first month of the season, he also went 30/100 for what, his 14th year in a row?
I'm by no means a Yankees fan, or even an Arod fan, but talent is talent.
Bonds always choked in the playoffs, too. :tu

MedicCook 10-05-2009 01:50 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Did anyone watch SNL Saturday? THey had a great A-Rod joke.

"Rumor has it that A-Rod & girlfriend Kate Hudson are pregnant. This will mark the first time that A-Rod has produced in October."

:r

MedicCook 10-05-2009 01:51 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shilala (Post 584244)
After missing the first month of the season, he also went 30/100 for what, his 14th year in a row?
I'm by no means a Yankees fan, or even an Arod fan, but talent is talent.
Bonds always choked in the playoffs, too. :tu

A-Rod also set an AL record for most RBIs in 1 inning and yes he continued his record for 14 straight 30/100 seasons. I personally hate A-Rod but he is still a great player, even without the juice.

shilala 10-05-2009 01:55 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MedicCook (Post 584247)
Did anyone watch SNL Saturday? THey had a great A-Rod joke.

"Rumor has it that A-Rod & girlfriend Kate Hudson are pregnant. This will mark the first time that A-Rod has produced in October."

:r

:r
Nice. :)

kelmac07 10-05-2009 02:05 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poet (Post 584194)
Well, it beats choking in September - or even June, you Met fan. :D

Thomas continues to RUB it in...throw some salt in there too while you're at it.

MedicCook 10-05-2009 02:07 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kelmac07 (Post 584286)
Thomas continues to RUB it in...throw some salt in there too while you're at it.

If the Mets had some health they would have been competitive. No team can over come having just about ever starter go down with injuries.

kelmac07 10-05-2009 02:08 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MedicCook (Post 584291)
If the Mets had some health they would have been competitive. No team can over come having just about ever starter go down with injuries.

I'd like to think that Ryan...but not sure if the pitching would have allowed that to happen this year. :td

MedicCook 10-05-2009 02:10 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by kelmac07 (Post 584293)
I'd like to think that Ryan...but not sure if the pitching would have allowed that to happen this year. :td

With the offense and defense the Mets have I think they will be good next year if healthy. They do need to pick up 1 or 2 pitchers this winter though to help out Johan.

yachties23 10-05-2009 02:18 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poet (Post 584194)
Well, it beats choking in September - or even June, you Met fan. :D

Thing is, regardless of how great his regular season numbers are, if he continues to fail in the post season, he will always have the mantra of choke artist

The Poet 10-05-2009 02:26 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poet (Post 516375)
I like Pudge. I think he was one of the best all-around catchers in the last 20 years. But that was is was. I don't see him helping Texas much. Could be wrong - we'll see.

Not to get off the A-Rod thing - or the obligatory Met-bashing (:D) - but let's revisit this post of mine from 8/20/09. At the time, some here disagreed with my assessment. One could argue that, since the Rangers were in the thick of things when they acquired Pudge yet ended up out of it, I would be right by default even had he hit like Babe Ruth. Well, he didn't. In 28 games Pudge got 98 ABs and only 24 hits - 8 doubles and merely 2 HRs. He knocked in 13 RBIs, got 5 base-on-balls, had 18 Ks, and ended with a middlin' .245 average, a poor .279 OBP, and a crappy .388 slugging percentage.

;s But hey, if Ivan were even half the player he once was, the Yanks would have resigned him.

MedicCook 10-05-2009 02:29 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poet (Post 584320)
Not to get off the A-Rod thing - or the obligatory Met-bashing (:D) - but let's revisit this post of mine from 8/20/09. At the time, some here disagreed with my assessment. One could argue that, since the Rangers were in the thick of things when they acquired Pudge yet ended up out of it, I would be right by default even had he hit like Babe Ruth. Well, he didn't. In 28 games Pudge got 98 ABs and only 24 hits - 8 doubles and merely 2 HRs. He knocked in 13 RBIs, got 5 base-on-balls, had 18 Ks, and ended with a middlin' .245 average, a poor .279 OBP, and a crappy .388 slugging percentage.

;s But hey, if Ivan were even half the player he once was, the Yanks would have resigned him.

You also have to remember that Pudge's best years were his steroid years in Texas.

VirtualSmitty 10-05-2009 02:55 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MedicCook (Post 584291)
If the Mets had some health they would have been competitive. No team can over come having just about ever starter go down with injuries.

I doubt it. Bad pitching and age has caught up with the Mets and I don't see much help coming from within the organization. They gonna need more than two pitchers to compete with the likes of the Phillies and Marlins. Heck, maybe even the Nats with Strasburg coming.

Mets need to dump Minaya, fire Emanuel, get rid of some of the castoffs they picked up, draft better, and start the rebuilding process.

yachties23 10-05-2009 03:52 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by VirtualSmitty (Post 584394)
I doubt it. Bad pitching and age has caught up with the Mets and I don't see much help coming from within the organization. They gonna need more than two pitchers to compete with the likes of the Phillies and Marlins. Heck, maybe even the Nats with Strasburg coming.

Mets need to dump Minaya, fire Emanuel, get rid of some of the castoffs they picked up, draft better, and start the rebuilding process.

Injuries played a huge part, you need to remember Joe that they were in first place six weeks into the season when Reyes and Delgado went down. I'm not saying the mets don't need help, I know exactly what I'd try to work on if I were Omar (since he is likely not to be fired.)

The Mets need 2 things, first and foremost, a #2 starter and a power hitting First Basemen.

Wow, as I'm writing this post Jeff Wilpon and Omar are Francesa. Anyways I digress.

The Mets need to acquire John Lackey. Adding a solid #2 starter with gritty stuff and pushing everybody down in the rotation, making a Pelf a #3 and hopefully Maine a #4. Not really sure about #5 but Niese, and Nieve both looked good at times and have potential. The bullpen is solid, keep KRod, don't pick up option Putz, make sure to keep Feliciano.

As for the Field; well Catching is a weakness, but livable with Santos, and a veteran backup. I would let Delgado walk, and try anything I could to get Adrian Gonzalez from SD. (Parnell, F-Mart, whatever it takes) Happy with Wright/Reyes/Castillo at 3rd, SS, 2nd as is.

Beltran is the best player on the team and should not be traded even if he wants his contract extension. Francoeur in right is fine, and than in left, they need to get lucky. They need a Bobby Abreau, type signing. A 5 million dollar outfielder whos going to hit .280, drive in 80, score 80, and hit 20 or so homers. With The wagner/delgado/putz money coming off the payroll, I sea no reason why the Mets can't improve in all three areas, and be an 85-90 win team next season.

The Poet 10-05-2009 04:04 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Funny, Chris - as a local guy who's listened to the fans and The Fan for decades now, all that seems vaguely familiar. I heard this last year re the Mets. I heard this the year before re the Mets. I heard this the year before that re the Mets. I've heard this nearly every year, and the only thing that's changed has been the names. I won't say the organization hasn't been trying - they've just not had a great deal of success.

yachties23 10-05-2009 04:09 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poet (Post 584527)
Funny, Chris - as a local guy who's listened to the fans and The Fan for decades now, all that seems vaguely familiar. I heard this last year re the Mets. I heard this the year before re the Mets. I heard this the year before that re the Mets. I've heard this nearly every year, and the only thing that's changed has been the names. I won't say the organization hasn't been trying - they've just not had a great deal of success.

They were one inning away from the World Series 3 years ago, and yes they have folded previously down the stretch, but all things being equal, I think a healthy team, with a few key additions will be very competitive in the NL east next season..
The Yankees trimmed fat off the payroll last year, almost 50 million, and went out and got 3 players, #1 Starter, #2 Starter and an MVP caliber first basemen, which put them over the top. If the Mets do half as well as the Yankees with the 30-40 million they will have left they will be a very good team next season.

shilala 10-05-2009 04:29 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The Poet (Post 584527)
Funny, Chris - as a local guy who's listened to the fans and The Fan for decades now, all that seems vaguely familiar. I heard this last year re the Mets. I heard this the year before re the Mets. I heard this the year before that re the Mets. I've heard this nearly every year, and the only thing that's changed has been the names. I won't say the organization hasn't been trying - they've just not had a great deal of success.

At least they ain't Pittsburgh. :)
I still love my suckos, but there's an organization that isn't even trying.

The Poet 10-05-2009 04:35 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shilala (Post 584578)
At least they ain't Pittsburgh. :)
I still love my suckos, but there's an organization that isn't even trying.

I feel for you, Scott. Other "small-market" teams at least try, and a few - like the Twins - do one amazingly fine job. But the Pirates are, well, the Pitts.

MedicCook 10-05-2009 07:03 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by shilala (Post 584578)
At least they ain't Pittsburgh. :)
I still love my suckos, but there's an organization that isn't even trying.

Which is a shame because the Pirates are producing great your players and then giving them away. They need an ownership that is not afraid to spend money in order to make money. Instead they have greedy onwers who take the free money from the Yankees, Red Sox, Dodgers & Mets every year and pocket it.

yachties23 10-05-2009 07:04 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MedicCook (Post 584932)
Which is a shame because the Pirates are producing great your players and then giving them away. They need an ownership that is not afraid to spend money in order to make money. Instead they have greedy onwers who take the free money from the Yankees, Red Sox, Dodgers & Mets every year and pocket it.

Which is why the NFL system > MLB.

SmokinDuck 10-06-2009 10:13 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Twins win!!! Twins win!!! Twins win!!!

Wahoo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hell yeah!!!!!

12 innings. What a game!!

MedicCook 10-06-2009 10:44 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SmokinDuck (Post 587641)
Twins win!!! Twins win!!! Twins win!!!

Wahoo!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hell yeah!!!!!

12 innings. What a game!!

Now they get to be swept by the Yankees. :D

VirtualSmitty 10-06-2009 10:45 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MedicCook (Post 587709)
Now they get to be swept by the Yankees. :D

:tpd::banger

kelmac07 10-07-2009 05:14 AM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
AWESOME end to a regular season!! :tu :tu

Blueface 10-08-2009 08:52 AM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MedicCook (Post 587709)
Now they get to be swept by the Yankees. :D

:r
:tpd:

Well, one down, two to go.

YANKEES!!!

VTDragon 10-08-2009 10:31 AM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by MedicCook (Post 587709)
Now they get to be swept by the Yankees. :D

I sincerely hope not. Yes, The Evil Empire won game one against an exhausted team but I'm rooting for anyone vs. the Yankees.

On another note, there are going to be a lot of very tired people in New England tomorrow after watching the Sox - Angels game, which does not start until about 10:00 PM Eastern time.

yachties23 10-08-2009 11:26 AM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by VTDragon (Post 590298)
I sincerely hope not. Yes, The Evil Empire won game one against an exhausted team but I'm rooting for anyone vs. the Yankees.

On another note, there are going to be a lot of very tired people in New England tomorrow after watching the Sox - Angels game, which does not start until about 10:00 PM Eastern time.

It's very difficult for fans of east coast teams when on west coast road trips.

The Poet 10-08-2009 12:34 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by VTDragon (Post 590298)
I sincerely hope not. Yes, The Evil Empire won game one against an exhausted team but I'm rooting for anyone vs. the Yankees.

And I'm rooting for the rats at that firetrap Fenway to attack the Rod Sux and give them the Black Plague.

:ss

VirtualSmitty 10-08-2009 07:28 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Dodgers won a real nail biter. Cardinals are only one game away from being eliminated.

yachties23 10-08-2009 07:39 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Anybody wanna tell me what Halladay was doing still in the field in a 1 run game?

kelmac07 10-08-2009 07:40 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Dodgers looked good tonight...so did Wainright. Shame for him to not get the one after the way he pitched.

MedicCook 10-08-2009 09:48 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
I think Torre borrowed some of the Yankee ghosts.

VirtualSmitty 10-09-2009 08:35 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
The Yankees WIN! :tu

yachties23 10-09-2009 09:44 PM

Re: *2009 MLB Thread*
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by VirtualSmitty (Post 592973)
The Yankees WIN! :tu

I was in the car and heard Sterling stumbling over the call... Nice win Joe, we may not have a game to watch Monday night.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:41 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.