PDA

View Full Version : Padron introducing a fat cigar to Anni line


mahtofire14
02-29-2016, 05:49 PM
I just read about Padron coming out with a new 4 inch by 54 rg 1964 Anniversary size. Don't know about you guys but I am definitely going to like that size!

AdamJoshua
02-29-2016, 06:23 PM
I just read about Padron coming out with a new 4 inch by 54 rg 1964 Anniversary size. Don't know about you guys but I am definitely going to like that size!

Just too too too easy....


:r

icehog3
02-29-2016, 06:33 PM
I just read about Padron coming out with a new 4 inch by 54 rg 1964 Anniversary size. Don't know about you guys but I am definitely going to like that size!

Sounds like the exact size (so I hear) of Ryan Suter's dingus!

sigsauer
02-29-2016, 06:51 PM
wowza......TMI!

mahtofire14
03-01-2016, 12:37 AM
Sounds like the exact size (so I hear) of Ryan Suter's dingus!

Haaaaaa!!!! I don't doubt it. What a bum. :r

mahtofire14
03-01-2016, 12:58 AM
Ok seriously. This cigar is coming out and I'm looking forward to it.

http://www.cigaraficionado.com/webfeatures/show/id/padron-adding-fat-cigar-to-anniversary-line-18631

Porch Dweller
03-01-2016, 07:19 AM
I've never been disappointed by a Padron so I'd give it a try.

stearns
03-01-2016, 07:36 AM
Scott gave me one of the SI-60s a few years ago, and despite my reservations he forced me to smoke it. I still remember it clearly, it was very interesting, definitely reminiscent of the smaller rg padrons but the smoke was a lot cooler and a little on the thin side. I probably won't get any of these, but I would be interested to hear how they turn out, maybe bringing the rg down a little from 60 to 54 will balance it out

mahtofire14
03-01-2016, 09:50 AM
Scott gave me one of the SI-60s a few years ago, and despite my reservations he forced me to smoke it. I still remember it clearly, it was very interesting, definitely reminiscent of the smaller rg padrons but the smoke was a lot cooler and a little on the thin side. I probably won't get any of these, but I would be interested to hear how they turn out, maybe bringing the rg down a little from 60 to 54 will balance it out

I'm normally not a fan of larger ring gauges. I feel like the wrapper/filler ratio is so skewed to the filler that it cancels out the great flavors that the wrapper brings to the cigar. But the 54 gauge I'm fine with. I love the Nubs cigars (insert punch line from Adam here) so I think I'll really enjoy this.

stearns
03-01-2016, 10:20 AM
I'm normally not a fan of larger ring gauges. I feel like the wrapper/filler ratio is so skewed to the filler that it cancels out the great flavors that the wrapper brings to the cigar. But the 54 gauge I'm fine with. I love the Nubs cigars (insert punch line from Adam here) so I think I'll really enjoy this.

Definitely post up a review if you grab any :tu

Sooner
03-01-2016, 10:30 AM
54 is not nearly as fat as one could go with a cigar. I would smoke one! Did the story say when this was going to come out?

jjirons69
03-01-2016, 10:45 AM
I'd try it, but the larger RGs aren't my first choice.

Adriftpanda
03-01-2016, 11:33 AM
I use to enjoy Padrons. Only problem I have with this size is that it is boxed pressed. I don't mind the 54rg because a lot of cigars are gearing towards bigger rg but to make it box pressed and that big of a rg is hard to smoke, for me at least.

mahtofire14
03-01-2016, 05:08 PM
54 is not nearly as fat as one could go with a cigar. I would smoke one! Did the story say when this was going to come out?

I believe it said March so hopefully soon.

Padron42
04-16-2016, 10:19 PM
Had a 1964 from the B&M that was about a 6.560 (can't remember the size's name). It was great, but I wouldn't buy another. I still prefer the smaller rg.

Genetic Defect
04-16-2016, 11:51 PM
Just too too too easy....


:r

Sounds like my prom date