PDA

View Full Version : Nat Sherman Cigars


ColdCuts
08-07-2014, 01:13 PM
There are a number of Nat Sherman blends. Anybody tried them? Anybody like them? They've got a beautiful shop in midtown Manhattan and have been in business since 1930. Somewhat of a New York City icon. I like that about them.

I've been in the "Nat Townhouse" a few times over the years, but only once did I pickup one of their namesake cigars. I remember enjoying it, but like I said, that was years ago. I couldn't tell ya anything about it.

I'm thinking of swinging by there on Sunday. Give 'em a shot. Anybody have experience with their cigars?

Bax
08-07-2014, 01:23 PM
I've had a few. Nice construction but very mild.

Zane
08-07-2014, 01:52 PM
I have only had the timeless. I enjoyed it

CdnStogie
08-07-2014, 03:06 PM
Had the Epoca for the first time a week ago - Excellent cigar, well constructed - Mild to medium I would say but very tasty and lots of thick smoke... I will be buying more

Shaneg
08-07-2014, 05:00 PM
Host must be sweetened with something. It's agreeable, but it is sweet, creamy and mild

ColdCuts
08-08-2014, 12:41 PM
Thanks for the input, fellas. According to their website they've got a few medium-full lines as well. I'll try 'em on Sunday and report my findings here early next week.

ColdCuts
08-14-2014, 11:19 AM
So, I tried a handful of the fuller-bodied Nat Sherman cigars:

Epoca, Breva, 42 x 5"
Timeless (DR blend), No. 5, 43 x 3.75"
Timeless (Nicaragua blend), #452, 52 x 4"
1930 Selection, Corona, 42 x 5.5"

These cigars will expel the notion that Nat Sherman only makes mild smokes.

Of the cigars I tried, I really enjoyed the Timeless (Nicaragua blend) #542 ($8.00/per on their website with no savings on a box of 21, or $168.00) and the Epoca ($8.95/per for the Breva on their website with no savings on a box of 20, or $179.00). If strength is what you're after, the 1930 Selection is where it's at.

If they weren't so spendy I'd buy a box of the Nicaraguan Timeless. But I'm a budget smoker. At those prices, perhaps I'll pick one up to smoke in the shop, but they can't be a part of my regular rotation. Here are pics of all but the Dominican Timeless:

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e99/davidhudec/Facebook/Mobile%20Uploads/2014-08/48A580D7-50DE-456C-9493-4B45AAF1E8B5_zpskoogprb0.jpg (http://s37.photobucket.com/user/davidhudec/media/Facebook/Mobile%20Uploads/2014-08/48A580D7-50DE-456C-9493-4B45AAF1E8B5_zpskoogprb0.jpg.html)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e99/davidhudec/Facebook/Mobile%20Uploads/2014-08/B35E816E-E7A3-4763-9753-8B4238B11D46_zps0eoythzd.jpg (http://s37.photobucket.com/user/davidhudec/media/Facebook/Mobile%20Uploads/2014-08/B35E816E-E7A3-4763-9753-8B4238B11D46_zps0eoythzd.jpg.html)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e99/davidhudec/Facebook/Mobile%20Uploads/2014-08/F8D635BF-F165-4379-BBBD-89D055957FDE_zpsdbwoc22j.jpg (http://s37.photobucket.com/user/davidhudec/media/Facebook/Mobile%20Uploads/2014-08/F8D635BF-F165-4379-BBBD-89D055957FDE_zpsdbwoc22j.jpg.html)

CdnStogie
08-20-2014, 07:03 AM
So, I tried a handful of the fuller-bodied Nat Sherman cigars:

Epoca, Breva, 42 x 5"
Timeless (DR blend), No. 5, 43 x 3.75"
Timeless (Nicaragua blend), #452, 52 x 4"
1930 Selection, Corona, 42 x 5.5"

These cigars will expel the notion that Nat Sherman only makes mild smokes.

Of the cigars I tried, I really enjoyed the Timeless (Nicaragua blend) #542 ($8.00/per on their website with no savings on a box of 21, or $168.00) and the Epoca ($8.95/per for the Breva on their website with no savings on a box of 20, or $179.00). If strength is what you're after, the 1930 Selection is where it's at.

If they weren't so spendy I'd buy a box of the Nicaraguan Timeless. But I'm a budget smoker. At those prices, perhaps I'll pick one up to smoke in the shop, but they can't be a part of my regular rotation. Here are pics of all but the Dominican Timeless:

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e99/davidhudec/Facebook/Mobile%20Uploads/2014-08/48A580D7-50DE-456C-9493-4B45AAF1E8B5_zpskoogprb0.jpg (http://s37.photobucket.com/user/davidhudec/media/Facebook/Mobile%20Uploads/2014-08/48A580D7-50DE-456C-9493-4B45AAF1E8B5_zpskoogprb0.jpg.html)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e99/davidhudec/Facebook/Mobile%20Uploads/2014-08/B35E816E-E7A3-4763-9753-8B4238B11D46_zps0eoythzd.jpg (http://s37.photobucket.com/user/davidhudec/media/Facebook/Mobile%20Uploads/2014-08/B35E816E-E7A3-4763-9753-8B4238B11D46_zps0eoythzd.jpg.html)

http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e99/davidhudec/Facebook/Mobile%20Uploads/2014-08/F8D635BF-F165-4379-BBBD-89D055957FDE_zpsdbwoc22j.jpg (http://s37.photobucket.com/user/davidhudec/media/Facebook/Mobile%20Uploads/2014-08/F8D635BF-F165-4379-BBBD-89D055957FDE_zpsdbwoc22j.jpg.html)


Glad you enjoyed. They are a bit pricey IMO but the Epoca is a great smoke nonetheless. I will pick up a few more of these. I have a couple of the 1930's sitting in my humi for a later date, along w/ a 1 or 2 of the Epoca's for a bit of aging.

AdamJoshua
08-20-2014, 11:39 AM
First box I ever bought were of the Timeless #2, I think I even brought a couple for Peter to my first **** herf.

pnoon
08-20-2014, 11:57 AM
First box I ever bought were of the Timeless #2, I think I even brought a couple for Peter to my first **** herf.

Yep. :tu

Zane
08-20-2014, 12:15 PM
First box I ever bought were of the Timeless #2, I think I even brought a couple for Peter to my first **** herf.

I like those a lot.

CigarEnvy
08-20-2014, 03:38 PM
I've seen this cigar on so many forums but have never pulled the trigger even though they make me curious. I guess I'm just a band fanatic who sometimes will buy a cigar based on their cigar band and in this case the Nats just don't do it for me bandwise. I should just buy one and smoke it and end the speculation.

ColdCuts
08-20-2014, 09:25 PM
I've seen this cigar on so many forums but have never pulled the trigger even though they make me curious. I guess I'm just a band fanatic who sometimes will buy a cigar based on their cigar band and in this case the Nats just don't do it for me bandwise. I should just buy one and smoke it and end the speculation.

I think the bands on Nat Sherman Metropolitan and Host are really sharp.